ReviewPOCUS journal2022
Integrative Volume Status Assessment.
Review in POCUS journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Point-of-Care Ultrasound Assessment of Pulmonary and Venous Congestion in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis and Acute Kidney Injury Receiving Albumin: An Exploratory Prospective Study from a Resource-Limited Tertiary Care Center in Western Mexico.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Bedside Ultrasound and Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Children with Septic Shock: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Point-of-care ultrasound to evaluate volume status in congestive heart failure.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
- Early detection of hypovolemia by venous pulse wave velocity and vena cava ultrasound imaging.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of AI-Assisted Focused Cardiac Ultrasound (FOCUS) in Primary Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Ultrasonographic Assessment of Caudal Vena Cava Collapsibility Index, Caudal Vena Cava-to-Aorta, and Femoral Vein-to-Artery Ratios in Healthy Sedated Adult Horses.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Association of the Lactate/Albumin Ratio with Mortality and Hypovolemia in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Classics in abdominal radiology: the jumping deer sign.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Knowledge and Awareness of Volume Assessment Among Emergency and Intensive Care Physicians in Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2025Article
- An Overview of the Management of Electrolyte Emergencies and Imbalances in Cancer Patients.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2025Review
- Venous excess ultrasonography (VExUS) captures dynamic changes in volume status surrounding hemodialysis: A multicenter prospective observational study.Research square · 2024Article
- Fluid dynamics of life: exploring the physiology and importance of water in the critical illness.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Exploring the Applicability of Pre-Anesthetic Cardiac POCUS in Unexpected Conditions: Could it be Helpful?POCUS journal · 2023Review
- Collaborative peri-transplant management of volume status, hypertension, and immunosuppression: enhancing kidney transplants for better outcomes.Renal failure · 2023Article
- Lung Ultrasound and Caval Indices to Assess Volume Status in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.POCUS journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Volume status assessment is a critical but challenging clinical skill and is especially important for the management of patients in the emergency department, intensive care unit, and dialysis unit where accurate intravascular assessment is necessary to guide appropriate fluid management. Assessment of volume status is subjective and can vary from provider to provider, posing clinical dilemmas. Traditional non-invasive methods of volume assessment include assessment of skin turgor, axillary sweat, peripheral edema, pulmonary crackles, orthostatic vital signs, and jugular venous distension. Invasive assessments of volume status include direct measurement of central venous pressure and pulmonary artery pressures. Each of these has their own limitations, challenges, and pitfalls and were often validated based on small cohorts with questionable comparators. In the past 30 years, the increased availability, progressive miniaturization, and falling price of ultrasound devices has made point of care ultrasound (POCUS) widely available. Emerging evidence base and increased uptake across multiple subspecialities has facilitated the adoption of this technology. POCUS is now widely available, relatively inexpensive, free of ionizing radiation, and can help providers make medical decisions with more precision. POCUS is not intended to replace the physical exam, but rather to complement clinical assessment, guiding providers to give thorough and accurate clinical care to their patients. We should be mindful of the nascent literature supporting the use of POCUS and other limitations as uptake increases among providers and be wary not to use POCUS to substitute clinical judgement, but integrate ultrasonographic findings carefully with history and clinical examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.