Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36896087›Full record

ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2022

Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid Following Arthrocentesis for Temporomandibular Joint Disc Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Shiju Mathew Jacob, Tapas Kumar Bandyopadhyay, Prabodh Kumar Chattopadhyay, Vinay Singh Parihar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07789860 (Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Efficacy of Injectable PRF), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07789860 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Efficacy of Injectable PRF(Platelet-rich Fibrin ) in Management of Temporomandibular Joint Internal Derangement: a Randomised Controlled Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSuez Canal UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsTemporomandibular Joint Internal DerangementArmsTMJ arthrocentesis, Autologous platelet rich fibrin ( injectable PRF), Hyaluronic acid gel (HA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shiju Mathew JacobDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Army Dental Center (Research & Referral), C/O Army Hospital (Research & Referral), Delhi Cantt, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3326-2504
Tapas Kumar BandyopadhyayDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Army Dental Center (Research & Referral), C/O Army Hospital (Research & Referral), Delhi Cantt, New Delhi, India.
Prabodh Kumar ChattopadhyayDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Army Dental Center (Research & Referral), C/O Army Hospital (Research & Referral), Delhi Cantt, New Delhi, India.
Vinay Singh PariharDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Army Dental Center (Research & Referral), C/O Army Hospital (Research & Referral), Delhi Cantt, New Delhi, India.
Army Hospital Research and Referral · INSubharti Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Injection of intra-articular medicaments is an accepted therapy for temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs). This study compares the efficacy of arthrocentesis followed by platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as compared to hyaluronic acid (HA) injections for TMDs unresponsive to conservative therapy. PRP injection following arthrocentesis was hypothesized to be better compared to arthrocentesis alone or when combined with HA injection. Methods: Forty-seven patients with TMDs enrolled in an RCT were randomly assigned to three groups: Group A-PRP, Group B-HA or Group C-control group of arthrocentesis alone. Pre-operative evaluation and post-operative changes at 1-, 3-, 6-month intervals were assessed for improvement in pain, maximum mouth opening, joint sounds and excursive movements. Statistical significance was set at Results: Post-operative joint sounds were present in three out of 16 patients in Group A; six out of 15 patients in Group B and eight out of 16 patients in Group C at 6-month follow-up. For the remaining outcome variables, no statistical difference between groups was observed. Conclusion: Both medicaments produced significant clinical improvements when compared to the control group. When comparing PRP against HA, none showed superiority over the other.

Indexed as

ArthrocentesisHyaluronic acidPlatelet-rich plasmaProlotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36896087
PMCPMC9989114
OpenAlexW3126352709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.