ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2023
Prognostic value of genetic alterations and
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insights into pet-based radiogenomics in oncology: an updated systematic review.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Clinical scoring systems, molecular subtypes and baseline [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Review
- Predicting survival, neurotoxicity and response in B-cell lymphoma patients treated with CAR-T therapy using an imaging features-based model.EJNMMI research · 2024Article
- Review
- Radiomics for predicting MGMT status in cerebral glioblastoma: comparison of different MRI sequences.Journal of radiation research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current standard front-line therapy for patients with diffuse large-B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)-rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP)-is found to be ineffective in up to one-third of them. Thus, their early identification is an important step towards testing alternative treatment options. In this retrospective study, we assessed the ability of
Indexed as
Identifiers
36895981PMC9989608W4323808765What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.