ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2023
Optimal first-line treatment for metastatic ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer-a narrative review.
Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
- First Things First: Navigating ALK-Positive Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment Options-A Podcast.Targeted oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Alectinib versus crizotinib as the first-line treatment in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a Chinese real-world cohort study.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Overview of Molecular Prognostication for Common Solid Tumor Histologies - What the Surgeon Should Know.Global spine journal · 2025Article
- The Role of Inhaled Chitosan-Based Nanoparticles in Lung Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Current opportunities and challenges in ALK-positive lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- Unraveling the Potential of ALK-Targeted Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comprehensive Insights and Future Directions.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Patient-led advocacy in ALK-positive lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2023Review
- Partial treatment response to alectinib in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with KIDINS220-ALK fusion.Precision clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: First-line treatment options for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) whose tumors harbour anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( Methods: A literature review of relevant randomised clinical trials was undertaken using Key Content and Findings: Crizotinib was established as the standard of care first-line treatment for patients with ALK+ aNSCLC in 2011. Since this time, alectinib, brigatinib, ensartinib and lorlatinib have all demonstrated superiority as first-line treatments compared to crizotinib, based on progression free survival, intra-cranial efficacy, and side-effect profiles. Conclusions: Options for optimal first-line treatment for ALK+ aNSCLC include alectinib, brigatinib and lorlatinib. This review serves as a resource summarizing data from key clinical trials with ALK inhibitors to aid in decision making when tailoring treatment for patients. Future research in the field includes real world analysis of efficacy and toxicity of next-generation ALK-inhibitors, identification of mechanisms of tumor persistence and acquired resistance, development of novel ALK inhibitors, and use of ALK-TKIs in earlier stage disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.