ArticleHuman reproduction open2023
Article in Human reproduction open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety assessment of autologous ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation in cancer patients: an updated review.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Female fertility preservation: 25 years of progress, expanding indications and future prospects.Human reproduction update · 2026Review
- Tumor-Infiltration Mimicking Model of Contaminated Ovarian Tissue as an Innovative Platform for Advanced Cancer Research.The AAPS journal · 2024Article
- De novo design of a nanoregulator for the dynamic restoration of ovarian tissue in cryopreservation and transplantation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Ovarian tissue cryopreservation: a narrative review on cryopreservation and transplantation techniques, and the clinical outcomes.Therapeutic advances in reproductive healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionIs it possible to purge leukemia cells from ovarian tissue (OT) fragments before transplantation? SUMMARY ANSWER: Our photodynamic therapy (PDT) approach has been shown to efficiently destroy leukemia cells from tumor-infiltration mimicking models (TIMs), indicating the feasibility of this technique to purge OT samples. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Autotransplantation of cryopreserved OT is the most suitable option to preserve fertility for prepubertal girls and women who require immediate cancer treatment. Up until now, more than 200 live births have already been reported after OT cryopreservation and transplantation. Leukemia is the 12th most common cancer in Europe among prepubertal girls and women of reproductive age and in 2020, the estimated number of new leukemia cases was higher than 33 000 in girls between 0 and 19 years old. Unfortunately, once their health has been restored, autotransplantation of cryopreserved OT for leukemia patients is not advised due to the high risk of transferring malignant cells back to the patient leading to leukemia recurrence. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: To safely transplant the OT from leukemia patients and restore their fertility, our goal was to develop a PDT strategy to eliminate leukemia PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING
methodsAfter establishing the best ORN formulation, our PDT approach was used to eradicate HL60 cells from MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The LARGE SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study did not use OT fragments from leukemia patients, but TIMs created after injection of HL60 cells into OT from healthy patients. Therefore, while the results are promising, whether our PDT approach will be equally successful in eliminating malignant cells from leukemia patients remains to be assessed. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsOur results showed that the purging procedure causes no significant impairment effect on follicle development and tissue quality, suggesting that our novel PDT procedure could be a promising strategy to destroy leukemia cells in fragments of OT, allowing safe transplantation in cancer survivors. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by grants from the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique de Belgique (FNRS-PDR Convention grant number T.0004.20 awarded to C.A.A.); Fondation Louvain (awarded to C.A.A.; a Ph.D. scholarship awarded to S.M., as part of a legacy from Mr Frans Heyes, and a Ph.D. scholarship awarded to A.D. as part of a legacy from Mrs. Ilse Schirmer); and Foundation Against Cancer (grant number 2018-042 awarded to A.C.). The authors declare no competing interests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.