Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36895826›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2023

Qualitative reactions to a low nicotine product standard for cigarettes from adolescents and young adults living in the United States who smoke.

Rachel L Denlinger-Apte, Rachel N Cassidy, Eric C Donny, Julissa Godin, Dorothy K Hatsukami, Ashley E Strahley, Kimberly D Wiseman, Suzanne M Colby, Jennifer W Tidey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Examining Spontaneous Cognitive and Emotional Reactions to Messages About Very Low Nicotine Cigarettes (VLNCs).Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachel L Denlinger-ApteDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Rachel N CassidyDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Eric C DonnyDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Julissa GodinDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Dorothy K HatsukamiMasonic Cancer Center and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Ashley E StrahleyDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Kimberly D WisemanDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Suzanne M ColbyDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Jennifer W TideyDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Biden Administration is considering a low nicotine product standard for cigarettes. This qualitative study examined reactions to a nicotine reduction policy among adolescents and young adults (AYA) who smoke cigarettes. After completing a lab study involving masked exposure either to low nicotine or normal nicotine research cigarettes and unmasked exposure to e-cigarettes varying in nicotine concentration and flavor, we conducted follow-up semi-structured interviews (N = 25) to explore participants' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of a low nicotine product standard and their anticipated tobacco use behavior after policy implementation. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, double-coded, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Nearly half of participants supported the policy because they thought it would prevent young people from starting smoking and/or would help people quit. Reasons some participants opposed the policy included beliefs that adults should have the choice to smoke or that a nicotine reduction policy is counterintuitive because the government benefits from cigarette sales. Others believed the policy would be ineffective because youth could circumvent the policy (e.g., illicit market) or would increase their smoking to maintain the same nicotine level. Almost half of participants said they would quit smoking while the other half said they would continue smoking, although potentially reduce their smoking. Overall, our qualitative findings point to the need for pre-policy media campaigns targeting AYA who smoke to minimize negative reactions, dispel fears, and correct misperceptions as well as encourage quitting and provide information on accessing cessation resources.

Indexed as

AdolescentsNicotineQualitative methodsSmokingTobacco control policy

Identifiers

PMID36895826
PMCPMC9989690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.