Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36895799›Full record

ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2023

Practical tips for navigating a program director transition.

Michael A Gisondi, Laura Hopson, Linda Regan, Jeremy Branzetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael A GisondiEmergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6800-3932
Laura HopsonEmergency Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Linda ReganEmergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jeremy BranzettiEmergency Medicine, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2397-0566

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Residency and fellowship program directors profoundly impact trainees, institutions, and patient safety. Yet, there is concern for rapid attrition in the role. The average program director tenure is only 4-7 years, and that timeline is likely a result of burnout or opportunities for career advancement. Program director transitions must be carefully executed to ensure minimal disruption to the program. Transitions benefit from clear communication with trainees and other stakeholders, well-planned successions or searches for a replacement, and clearly delineated expectations and responsibilities of the outgoing program director. In this Practical Tips, four former residency program directors offer a roadmap for a successful program director transition, with specific recommendations to guide critical decisions and steps in the process. Themes emphasized include readiness for a transition, communication strategies, alignment of program mission and search efforts, and anticipatory support to ensure the success of the new director.

Indexed as

Program Director; Residency; Fellowship; Transition; Search; Succession;

Identifiers

PMID36895799
PMCPMC9989543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.