Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36895661›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2023

Quality assurance for non-contrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis during a period of supply chain disruption leading to iodinated contrast shortage in the emergency department setting.

Luis Fernando Calimano-Ramirez, Mauricio Hernandez, Anmol Singh, Kazim Ziya Gumus, Wanda Marfori, Mayur K Virarkar, Chandana Lall, Dheeraj Reddy Gopireddy

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luis Fernando Calimano-RamirezDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.
Mauricio HernandezDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5649-6215
Anmol SinghDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7360-5914
Kazim Ziya GumusDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1450-6868
Wanda MarforiDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.
Mayur K VirarkarDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5825-3102
Chandana LallDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5573-9246
Dheeraj Reddy GopireddyDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8441-7804
University of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Iodinated contrast media (ICM) shortage crisis due to COVID-19 lockdowns led to a need for alternate imaging protocols consisting of non-contrast computed tomography (CT) for abdominal complaints and related trauma indications in emergency department (ED) settings. This quality assurance study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes of protocol modifications during ICM shortage and identify potential imaging misdiagnosis of acute abdominal complaints and related trauma. Material and Methods: The study included 424 ED patients with abdominal pain, falls, or motor vehicle collision (MVC)-related trauma who had non-contrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis in May 2022. We accessed the initial complaint, order indication, non-contrast CT results, any acute or incidental findings, and any follow-up imaging of the same body region with their results. We evaluated their association utilizing Chi-squared tests. We assessed sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values using follow-up scan confirmation. Results: Across initial complaint categories, 72.9% of cases were abdominal pain, and 37.3% received positive findings. Only 22.6% of patients had follow-up imaging. Most confirmed original reports were for abdominal pain. We also found three reports of missed findings. There were significant associations between complaint categories and initial non-contrast CT report results ( Conclusion: Rate of missed acute diagnoses using non-contrast CT for patients presenting to the ED with acute abdominal complaints or related trauma has been low during the recent shortage, but further investigation would be needed to verify and quantify the implications of not routinely giving oral or intravenous contrast in the ED.

Indexed as

Abdominal and pelvic computed tomographyEmergency departmentIodinated contrast shortageQuality assurance

Identifiers

PMID36895661
PMCPMC9990841
OpenAlexW4319769504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.