Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36895482›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Efficacy and safety of different radiotherapy doses in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: A retrospective study.

Yuyan Xu, Haizhou Zou, Zhenyong Shao, Xuebang Zhang, XiaoLin Ren, Huijuan He, Dahai Zhang, Dexi Du, Changlin Zou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yuyan XuDepartment of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Haizhou ZouDepartment of Oncology, Wenzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wenzhou, China.
Zhenyong ShaoDepartment of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xuebang ZhangDepartment of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
XiaoLin RenDepartment of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Huijuan HeDepartment of Radiotherapy, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.
Dahai ZhangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Dongyang People's Hospital, Jinhua, China.
Dexi DuDepartment of Radiotherapy Oncology, Lishui Central Hospital, Lishui, China.
Changlin ZouDepartment of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University · CNDongyang People's Hospital · CNLishui Central Hospital · CNQuzhou City People's Hospital · CNWenzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with different radiotherapy doses (45Gy and 50.4Gy) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Methods: Herein, 120 patients with LARC were retrospectively enrolled between January 2016 and June 2021. All patients underwent two courses of induction chemotherapy (XELOX), chemoradiotherapy, and total mesorectum excision (TME). A total of 72 patients received a radiotherapy dose of 50.4 Gy, while 48 patients received a dose of 45 Gy. Surgery was then performed within 5-12 weeks following nCRT. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the baseline characteristics of the two groups. The rate of good pathological response in the 50.4Gy group was 59.72% (43/72), while in the 45Gy group achieved 64.58% (31/48) (P>0.05). The disease control rate (DCR) in the 50.4Gy group was 88.89% (64/72), compared to 89.58% (43/48) in the 45Gy group (P>0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions for radioactive proctitis, myelosuppression, and intestinal obstruction or perforation differed significantly between the two groups (P<0.05). The anal retention rate in the 50.4Gy group was significantly higher in contrast to the 45Gy group (P<0.05). Conclusions: Patients receiving a radiotherapy dose of 50.4Gy have a better anal retention rate but also a higher incidence of adverse events such as radioactive proctitis, myelosuppression, and intestinal obstruction or perforation, and a comparable prognosis to patients treated with a radiotherapy dose of 45Gy.

Indexed as

adverse reactionsintensity-modulated radiation therapylocally advanced rectal cancerneoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyradiotherapy dose

Identifiers

PMID36895482
PMCPMC9989274
OpenAlexW4321458542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.