Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36895439›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023

UNet and MobileNet CNN-based model observers for CT protocol optimization: comparative performance evaluation by means of phantom CT images.

Federico Valeri, Maurizio Bartolucci, Elena Cantoni, Roberto Carpi, Evaristo Cisbani, Ilaria Cupparo, Sandra Doria, Cesare Gori, Mauro Grigioni, Lorenzo Lasagni and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. AI for image quality and patient safety in CT and MRI.European radiology experimental · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Federico ValeriUniversità degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Florence, Italy.
Maurizio BartolucciOspedale S. Stefano, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, SOC Radiodiagnostica, Prato, Italy.
Elena CantoniUniversità degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Florence, Italy.
Roberto CarpiOspedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, SOC Radiologia, Florence, Italy.
Evaristo CisbaniIstituto Superiore di Sanità, Centro Nazionale Tecnologie Innvative in Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6774-8473
Ilaria CupparoUniversità degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Florence, Italy.
Sandra DoriaIstituto di Chimica dei Composti OrganoMetallici, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9440-1643
Cesare GoriUniversità degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Florence, Italy.
Mauro GrigioniIstituto Superiore di Sanità, Centro Nazionale Tecnologie Innvative in Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy.
Lorenzo LasagniUniversità degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7693-3024
Alessandro MarconiUniversità degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9889-4238
Lorenzo Nicola MazzoniOspedale San Jacopo, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, UO Fisica Sanitaria Prato e Pistoia, Pistoia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3629-7278
Vittorio MieleAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, SOD Radiodiagnostica di Emergenza-Urgenza, Florence, Italy.
Silvia PradellaAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, SOD Radiodiagnostica di Emergenza-Urgenza, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8296-7773
Guido RisalitiUniversità degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Florence, Italy.
Valentina SanguinetiIstituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Pattern Analysis & Computer Vision, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7995-6205
Diego SonaFondazione Bruno Kessler, Data Science for Health Unit, Trento, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2883-5336
Letizia VannucchiOspedale S. Jacopo, AUSL Toscana Centro, SOC Radiodiagnostica, Pistoia, Italy.
Adriana TaddeucciAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, UO Fisica Sanitaria, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2292-6221

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this work is the development and characterization of a model observer (MO) based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), trained to mimic human observers in image evaluation in terms of detection and localization of low-contrast objects in CT scans acquired on a reference phantom. The final goal is automatic image quality evaluation and CT protocol optimization to fulfill the ALARA principle. Approach: Preliminary work was carried out to collect localization confidence ratings of human observers for signal presence/absence from a dataset of 30,000 CT images acquired on a PolyMethyl MethAcrylate phantom containing inserts filled with iodinated contrast media at different concentrations. The collected data were used to generate the labels for the training of the artificial neural networks. We developed and compared two CNN architectures based respectively on Unet and MobileNetV2, specifically adapted to achieve the double tasks of classification and localization. The CNN evaluation was performed by computing the area under localization-ROC curve (LAUC) and accuracy metrics on the test dataset. Results: The mean of absolute percentage error between the LAUC of the human observer and MO was found to be below 5% for the most significative test data subsets. An elevated inter-rater agreement was achieved in terms of S-statistics and other common statistical indices. Conclusions: Very good agreement was measured between the human observer and MO, as well as between the performance of the two algorithms. Therefore, this work is highly supportive of the feasibility of employing CNN-MO combined with a specifically designed phantom for CT protocol optimization programs.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputed tomographydose optimizationimage quality evaluationmodel observer

Identifiers

PMID36895439
PMCPMC9989681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.