Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36895294›Full record

ArticleJournal of hematology2023

Clofarabine in Pediatric Acute Relapsed or Refractory Leukemia: Where Do We Stand on the Bridge to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation?

Sarah Ramiz, Osama Elhaj, Khawar Siddiqui, Saadiya Khan, Hawazen AlSaedi, Awatif AlAnazi, Ali Al-Ahmari, Abdullah Al-Jefri, Oudai Sahvan, Mouhab Ayas and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarah RamizDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia.
Osama ElhajDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia.
Khawar SiddiquiDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia.
Saadiya KhanDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia.
Hawazen AlSaediDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia.
Awatif AlAnaziDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia.
Ali Al-AhmariDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Al-JefriDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia.
Oudai SahvanCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia.
Mouhab AyasDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim GhemlasDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite pronounced improvement in overall survival (OS) in pediatric leukemia, a proportion of patients continue to suffer from lack of response or relapse, and the management of such patients is exceedingly difficult. Immunotherapy and engineered chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy have shown promising results in the course of relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, conventional chemotherapy continues to be utilized for re-induction purposes whether independently or in combination with immunotherapy. Methods: Forty-three pediatric leukemia patients (age < 14 years at diagnosis) consecutively diagnosed at our institution and got treated with clofarabine based regimen at a single tertiary care hospital between January 2005 and December 2019 were enrolled in this study. ALL comprised of 30 (69.8%) patients of the cohort while the remaining 13 (30.2%) were with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Results: Post-clofarabine bone marrow (BM) was negative in 18 (45.0%) cases. Overall clofarabine failure rate was 58.1% (n = 25) with 60.0% (n = 18) in ALL and 53.8% (n = 7) in AML (P = 0.747). Eighteen (41.9%) patients eventually underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); 11 (61.1%) were from ALL group and remaining seven (38.9%) were AML (P = 0.332). Three- and 5-year OS of our patients was 37.7±7.6% and 32.7±7.3%. There was a trend of better OS for ALL patients compared to AML (40.9±9.3% vs. 15.4±10.0%, P = 0.492). Cumulative probability of 5-year OS was significantly better in transplanted patients (48.1±12.1% vs. 21.4±8.4%, P = 0.024). Conclusions: Though almost 90% of our patients proceeded to HSCT with complete response post-clofarabine treatment, yet clofarabine-based regimens are associated with the significant burden of infectious complications and sepsis-related deaths.

Indexed as

Bridging chemotherapyClofarabineStem cell transplantation

Identifiers

PMID36895294
PMCPMC9990710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.