ArticleNursing open2023
How coaching training transforms nurses' behaviour: The effectiveness of coaching training according to objective measures.
Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the transition of behavioural changes of participants before and after the training using a scale that can objectively evaluate coaching training for nurses.
designAfter a cross-sectional study, a quasi-experimental study was conducted.
methodsWe examined the reliability and validity of the Coaching Skill Assessment plus (CSAplus), which was developed to measure the effectiveness of coaching training for corporate leaders. Next, a repeated measures analysis of variance was conducted on two types of coaching training for nurses conducted at a university hospital, with the CSAplus scores of participants before, 1 month and 6 months after the training as the dependent variable.
resultsThe CSAplus is a three-factor instrument with good reliability and validity. Participants' CSAplus scores improved after training, but there were differences in the magnitude and persistence of the training effects. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Hospital staff, professional coaches and their clients were involved in data collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.