Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36895055›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2023

Extensive sequence duplication in Arabidopsis revealed by pseudo-heterozygosity.

Benjamin Jaegle, Rahul Pisupati, Luz Mayela Soto-Jiménez, Robin Burns, Fernando A Rabanal, Magnus Nordborg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evolution letters · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. SNP-RFLP Markers for the Study ofEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Benjamin JaegleGregor Mendel Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria.
Rahul PisupatiGregor Mendel Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria.
Luz Mayela Soto-JiménezGregor Mendel Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria.
Robin BurnsGregor Mendel Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria.
Fernando A RabanalMax Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Magnus NordborgGregor Mendel Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Biocenter, Vienna, Austria. magnus.nordborg@gmi.oeaw.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-7178-9748
Gregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology · ATMax Planck Institute for Developmental Biology · DE

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 3684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is apparent that genomes harbor much structural variation that is largely undetected for technical reasons. Such variation can cause artifacts when short-read sequencing data are mapped to a reference genome. Spurious SNPs may result from mapping of reads to unrecognized duplicated regions. Calling SNP using the raw reads of the 1001 Arabidopsis Genomes Project we identified 3.3 million (44%) heterozygous SNPs. Given that Arabidopsis thaliana (A. thaliana) is highly selfing, and that extensively heterozygous individuals have been removed, we hypothesize that these SNPs reflected cryptic copy number variation.

resultsThe heterozygosity we observe consists of particular SNPs being heterozygous across individuals in a manner that strongly suggests it reflects shared segregating duplications rather than random tracts of residual heterozygosity due to occasional outcrossing. Focusing on such pseudo-heterozygosity in annotated genes, we use genome-wide association to map the position of the duplicates. We identify 2500 putatively duplicated genes and validate them using de novo genome assemblies from six lines. Specific examples included an annotated gene and nearby transposon that transpose together. We also demonstrate that cryptic structural variation produces highly inaccurate estimates of DNA methylation polymorphism.

conclusionsOur study confirms that most heterozygous SNP calls in A. thaliana are artifacts and suggest that great caution is needed when analyzing SNP data from short-read sequencing. The finding that 10% of annotated genes exhibit copy-number variation, and the realization that neither gene- nor transposon-annotation necessarily tells us what is actually mobile in the genome suggests that future analyses based on independently assembled genomes will be very informative.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisDNA Copy Number VariationsGenome, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNAGene duplicationGWASMethylationSNP callingStructural variation

Identifiers

PMID36895055
PMCPMC9999624
OpenAlexW4323655170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.