Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36895024›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2023

Simulation device for shoulder reductions: overview of prototyping, testing, and design instructions.

Sorab Taneja, Will Tenpas, Mehul Jain, Peter Alfonsi, Abhinav Ratagiri, Ann Saterbak, Jason Theiling

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sorab Taneja *Duke Engineering Design Pod, 308 Research Dr, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Will Tenpas *Duke Engineering Design Pod, 308 Research Dr, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Mehul Jain *Duke Engineering Design Pod, 308 Research Dr, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Peter AlfonsiDuke Engineering Design Pod, 308 Research Dr, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Abhinav RatagiriDuke Engineering Design Pod, 308 Research Dr, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Ann SaterbakDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 101 Science Dr, Box 90281, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. ann.saterbak@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0084-0723
Jason TheilingDepartment of Surgery, Box 3096, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Duke Energy (United States) · USDuke University · USDurham Technical Community College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShoulder dislocations are common occurrences, yet there are few simulation devices to train medical personnel on how to reduce these dislocations. Reductions require a familiarity with the shoulder and a nuanced motion against strong muscle tension. The goal of this work is to describe the design of an easily replicated, low-cost simulator for training shoulder reductions. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn iterative, stepwise engineering design process was used to design and implement ReducTrain. A needs analysis with clinical experts led to the selection of the traction-countertraction and external rotation methods as educationally relevant techniques to include. A set of design requirements and acceptance criteria was established that considered durability, assembly time, and cost. An iterative prototyping development process was used to meet the acceptance criteria. Testing protocols for each design requirement are also presented. Step-by-step instructions are provided to allow the replication of ReducTrain from easily sourced materials, including plywood, resistance bands, dowels, and various fasteners, as well as a 3D-printed shoulder model, whose printable file is included at a link in the Additional file 1: Appendix.

resultsA description of the final model is given. The total cost for all materials for one ReducTrain model is under US $200, and it takes about 3 h and 20 min to assemble. Based on repetitive testing, the device should not see any noticeable changes in durability after 1000 uses but may exhibit some changes in resistance band strength after 2000 uses. DISCUSSION: The ReducTrain device fills a gap in emergency medicine and orthopedic simulation. Its wide variety of uses points to its utility in several instructional formats. With the rise of makerspaces and public workshops, the construction of the device can be easily completed. While the device has some limitations, its robust design allows for simple upkeep and a customizable training experience.

conclusionA simplified anatomical design allows for the ReducTrain model to serve as a viable training device for shoulder reductions.

Indexed as

External rotation maneuverShoulder reductionSimulation deviceTraction-countertraction

Identifiers

PMID36895024
PMCPMC9999631
OpenAlexW4323661606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.