Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36895001›Full record

ReviewJournal of intensive care2023

Guideline-based management of acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Seitaro Fujishima

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06371378 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Effect of Different Peep Values on Gastric Residual Volume and Pulmonary Aspiration Risk in Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery in Prone Position

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2024 to 2024Enrolled111ConditionsRespiratory Aspiration of Gastric ContentArmsPEEP 0, PEEP 4, PEEP 8
NCT06837402 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Epidemiology of Non- Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Argentina: a Multicenter Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorArgentinian Intensive Care SocietyRan2025 to 2026Enrolled246ConditionsRespiration, Artificial, Noninvasive Ventilation, Intensive Care Units
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Association of Arterial PaCODiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Potential relationships between circulating gene expression ofJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seitaro FujishimaCenter for General Medicine Education, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan. fujishim@keio.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8823-8440
Keio University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is defined by acute and progressive hypoxemia caused by various cardiorespiratory or systemic diseases in previously healthy patients. Among ARF, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a serious condition with bilateral lung infiltration, which develops secondary to a variety of underlying conditions, diseases, or injuries. This review summarizes the current standard of care for ARF and ARDS based on current major guidelines in this field. When administering fluid in patients with ARF, particularly ARDS, restrictive strategies need to be considered in patients without shock or multiple organ dysfunction. Regarding oxygenation targets, avoiding excessive hyperoxemia and hypoxemia is probably a reasonable choice. As a result of the rapid spread and accumulation of evidence for high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation, it is now weakly recommended for the respiratory management of ARF in general and even for initial management of ARDS. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation is also weakly recommended for the management of certain ARF conditions and as initial management of ARDS. Low tidal volume ventilation is now weakly recommended for all patients with ARF and strongly recommended for patients with ARDS. Limiting plateau pressure and high-level PEEP are weakly recommended for moderate-to-severe ARDS. Prone position ventilation with prolonged hours is weakly to strongly recommended for moderate-to-severe ARDS. In patients with COVID-19, ventilatory management is essentially the same as for ARF and ARDS, but awake prone positioning may be considered. In addition to standard care, treatment optimization and individualization, as well as the introduction of exploratory treatment, should be considered as appropriate. As a single pathogen, such as SARS-CoV-2, exhibits a wide variety of pathologies and lung dysfunction, ventilatory management for ARF and ARDS may be better tailored according to the respiratory physiologic status of individual patients rather than the causal or underlying diseases and conditions.

Indexed as

Acute respiratory distress syndromeAcute respiratory failureBrain natriuretic peptideCorticosteroidsECMOGuidelineHigh-flow nasal cannula oxygenationNoninvasive positive pressure ventilationOxygenation targets

Identifiers

PMID36895001
PMCPMC9998250
OpenAlexW4323807671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.