Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36894997›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2023

The role of partners, parents and friends in shaping young women's reproductive choices in Peri-urban Nairobi: a qualitative study.

Anja Zinke-Allmang, Amiya Bhatia, Krittika Gorur, Rahma Hassan, Amy Shipow, Concilia Ogolla, Kees Keizer, Beniamino Cislaghi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Provider perspectives on adolescent access to contraception in South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anja Zinke-AllmangDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. anja.zinke@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7183-063X
Amiya BhatiaDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Krittika GorurBusara Center for Behavioral Economics, Nairobi, Kenya.
Rahma HassanUniversity of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Amy ShipowBusara Center for Behavioral Economics, Nairobi, Kenya.
Concilia OgollaBusara Center for Behavioral Economics, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kees KeizerUniversity of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Beniamino CislaghiDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Busara Center for Behavioral Economics · KELondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Nairobi · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContraceptive use among young women in Nairobi remains low despite high general knowledge of family planning (FP) methods. This paper draws on social norms theory to explore the role of key influencers (partners, parents and friends) in women's FP use and how women anticipate normative reactions or sanctions.

methodsA qualitative study with 16 women, 10 men and 14 key influencers across 7 peri-urban wards in Nairobi, Kenya. Interviews were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 by phone. A thematic analysis was conducted.

resultsWomen identified parents, specifically mothers, aunts, partners, friends and healthcare workers as key influencers on FP. Their interactions with these key influencers varied based on trust, the information they needed about FP, and whether they perceived a key influencer to perpetuate or challenge existing social norms on FP. Mothers were perceived to understand the social risks of using FP and thus could advise on discreet FP use, and aunts were trusted and approachable sources to impartially describe the benefits and drawbacks of FP. Although women identified partners as key FP decision makers, they were cognisant of possible power imbalances affecting a final FP choice.

conclusionsFP interventions should consider the normative influence key actors have on women's FP choices. Opportunities to design and deliver network-level interventions which seek to engage with social norms surrounding FP in order to challenge misconceptions and misinformation among key influencers should be explored. Intervention design should consider dynamics of secrecy, trust and emotional closeness that mediate discussions of FP to address changing norms. Further training to change norms held by healthcare providers about why women, in particular unmarried young women, access FP should be provided to reduce barriers for FP access.

Indexed as

COVID-19FriendsFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansKenyaMalePandemicsParentsFamily planningGenderKenyaSocial norms

Identifiers

PMID36894997
PMCPMC9997433
OpenAlexW4323812249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.