Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36894990›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Living through uncertainty: a qualitative study on leadership and resilience in primary healthcare during COVID-19.

Soila Karreinen, Henna Paananen, Laura Kihlström, Kristiina Janhonen, Moona Huhtakangas, Marjaana Viita-Aho, Liina-Kaisa Tynkkynen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metaphors of Health System Resilience as Tools for Preparedness Imagination.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Organizational Resilience in Healthcare: A Scoping Review.Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Soila KarreinenFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland. soila.karreinen@tuni.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3115-2408
Henna PaananenFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Laura KihlströmWelfare State Research and Reform, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Kristiina JanhonenWelfare State Research and Reform, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Moona HuhtakangasWelfare State Research and Reform, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Marjaana Viita-AhoFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Liina-Kaisa TynkkynenFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Tampere University · FIFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FI

Funding

Academy of Finland 340501Academy of Finland 340503Strategic Research Council 345300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResilience is often referred to when assessing the ability of health systems to maintain their functions during unexpected events. Primary healthcare forms the basis for the health system and thus its resilient responses are vital for the outcomes of the whole system. Understanding how primary healthcare organisations are able to build resilience before, during, and after unexpected or sudden shocks, is key to public health preparedness. This study aims to identify how leaders responsible for local health systems interpreted changes in their operational environment during the first year of COVID-19, and to elucidate how these views reflect aspects of resilience in healthcare.

methodsThe data consist of 14 semi-structured individual interviews with leaders of local health systems in Finland representing primary healthcare. The participants were recruited from four regions. An abductive thematic analysis was used to identify entities from the viewpoints of the purpose, resources, and processes of resilience in the healthcare organisation.

resultsResults were summarised as six themes, which suggest that embracing uncertainty is viewed by the interviewees a basis for primary healthcare functioning. Leading towards adaptability was regarded a distinct leadership task enabling the organisation to modify its functions according to demands of the changing operational environment. Workforce, knowledge and sensemaking, as well as collaboration represented what the leaders viewed as the means for achieving adaptability. The ability to adapt functioned to comprehensively meet the population's service needs built on a holistic approach.

conclusionsThe results showed how the leaders who participated in this study adapted their work during changes brought on by the pandemic, and what they viewed as critical for maintaining organisational resilience. The leaders considered embracing uncertainty as a principal feature of their work rather than viewing uncertainty as aberrant and something to avoid. These notions, along with what the leaders considered as critical means for building resilience and adaptability should be addressed and elaborated in future research. Research on resilience and leadership should be conducted more in the complex context of primary healthcare, where cumulative stresses are encountered and processed continuously.

Indexed as

COVID-19LeadershipHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchUncertaintyComplexityCOVID-19FinlandLeadershipPrimary carePrimary healthcareResilience

Identifiers

PMID36894990
PMCPMC9997436
OpenAlexW4323655113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.