Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36894810›Full record

Observational studySurgical endoscopy2023

Clinical application of machine learning and computer vision to indocyanine green quantification for dynamic intraoperative tissue characterisation: how to do it.

Niall P Hardy, Pol MacAonghusa, Jeffrey Dalli, Gareth Gallagher, Jonathan P Epperlein, Conor Shields, Jurgen Mulsow, Ailín C Rogers, Ann E Brannigan, John B Conneely and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04220242 (Future of Colorectal Cancer Surgery 1- Development of an Artificial Intelligence Model for the Interpretation of Colorectal Cancer Fluorescence Signalling Using Indocyanine Green), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04220242 unknown statusnot on this map

Future of Colorectal Cancer Surgery 1- Development of an Artificial Intelligence Model for the Interpretation of Colorectal Cancer Fluorescence Signalling Using Indocyanine Green

TypeobservationalSponsorMater Misericordiae University HospitalRan2019 to 2023Enrolled250ConditionsColorectal Cancer, SurgeryArmsVideo recordings with analysis thereafter applied, Examination of microsections of tissue excised for the purposes of cancer resection, Cancer organoid development and testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Niall P HardyUCD Centre for Precision Surgery, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7036-3910
Pol MacAonghusaIBM Research Europe, Dublin, Ireland.
Jeffrey DalliUCD Centre for Precision Surgery, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Gareth GallagherUCD Centre for Precision Surgery, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jonathan P EpperleinIBM Research Europe, Dublin, Ireland.
Conor ShieldsDepartment of General and Colorectal Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Jurgen MulsowDepartment of General and Colorectal Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Ailín C RogersDepartment of General and Colorectal Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Ann E BranniganDepartment of General and Colorectal Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
John B ConneelyDepartment of Hepatobiliary, Foregut and Bariatric Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Peter M NearyDepartment of General and Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Waterford, University College Cork, Waterford, Ireland.
Ronan A CahillUCD Centre for Precision Surgery, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. ronan.cahill@ucd.ie.
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital · IEUniversity College Dublin · IEIBM Research - Ireland · IEUniversity College Cork · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIndocyanine green (ICG) quantification and assessment by machine learning (ML) could discriminate tissue types through perfusion characterisation, including delineation of malignancy. Here, we detail the important challenges overcome before effective clinical validation of such capability in a prospective patient series of quantitative fluorescence angiograms regarding primary and secondary colorectal neoplasia.

methodsICG perfusion videos from 50 patients (37 with benign (13) and malignant (24) rectal tumours and 13 with colorectal liver metastases) of between 2- and 15-min duration following intravenously administered ICG were formally studied (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04220242). Video quality with respect to interpretative ML reliability was studied observing practical, technical and technological aspects of fluorescence signal acquisition. Investigated parameters included ICG dosing and administration, distance-intensity fluorescent signal variation, tissue and camera movement (including real-time camera tracking) as well as sampling issues with user-selected digital tissue biopsy. Attenuating strategies for the identified problems were developed, applied and evaluated. ML methods to classify extracted data, including datasets with interrupted time-series lengths with inference simulated data were also evaluated.

resultsDefinable, remediable challenges arose across both rectal and liver cohorts. Varying ICG dose by tissue type was identified as an important feature of real-time fluorescence quantification. Multi-region sampling within a lesion mitigated representation issues whilst distance-intensity relationships, as well as movement-instability issues, were demonstrated and ameliorated with post-processing techniques including normalisation and smoothing of extracted time-fluorescence curves. ML methods (automated feature extraction and classification) enabled ML algorithms glean excellent pathological categorisation results (AUC-ROC > 0.9, 37 rectal lesions) with imputation proving a robust method of compensation for interrupted time-series data with duration discrepancies.

conclusionPurposeful clinical and data-processing protocols enable powerful pathological characterisation with existing clinical systems. Video analysis as shown can inform iterative and definitive clinical validation studies on how to close the translation gap between research applications and real-world, real-time clinical utility.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsIndocyanine GreenComputersHumansProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsIndocyanine GreenArtificial intelligenceColorectal cancerFluorescence-guided surgeryIndocyanine green quantificationMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID36894810
PMCPMC10338552
OpenAlexW4323810368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.