Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36894757›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2023

The biopsychosocial impact of hypermobility spectrum disorders in adults: a scoping review.

Natalie L Clark, Melissa Johnson, Amar Rangan, Lucksy Kottam, Katherine Swainston

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Hypermobility-Importance in rheumatology].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie L ClarkSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9462-4425
Melissa JohnsonSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7181-738X
Amar RanganSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5452-8578
Lucksy KottamSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7976-2416
Katherine SwainstonSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. kate.swainston@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6548-7441
South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNewcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Joint hypermobility affects approximately 30% of the United Kingdom (UK) population, characterised by the ability to move joints beyond the physiological limits. Associated conditions include Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorders, affecting individuals across physical, psychological and social levels detrimentally impacting their health and wellbeing. The scoping review aims to describe the known biopsychosocial impact of joint hypermobility conditions in adults over the last decade. Additional objectives include to (1) identify the types of studies that address these factors, (2) to understand how the impact of the condition is measured and managed and (3) what healthcare professionals (HCPs) are involved. The scoping review was conducted using the five-stage framework by Arksey and O'Malley. The search strategy related to two main keywords, "hypermobility" and, "biopsychosocial" across a number of electronic databases. A pilot search was conducted to determine the suitability of the databases and terms. Following the search, the data was extracted and charted, summarised and narratively reported. 32 studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority were conducted in either the UK or United States of America and case-control in design. The biopsychosocial impact was wide-ranging including, but not limited to, musculoskeletal system and dermatology, gastroenterology, mood and anxiety disorders, education and employments. This review is the first of its kind to summarise all reported symptoms and impact of joint hypermobility conditions in adults, highlighting a clear need to promote a multidisciplinary and holistic approach in raising awareness of these conditions and improving their management.

Indexed as

Ehlers-Danlos SyndromeJoint InstabilityAdultAffectHumansPhysical ExaminationUnited KingdomBenign hypermobility syndromeBiopsychosocialEhlers-Danlos syndromeHypermobilityJointModelsQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID36894757
PMCPMC10126066
OpenAlexW4323658127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.