Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36894742›Full record

ArticleISME communications2023

A meta-analysis of the stony coral tissue loss disease microbiome finds key bacteria in unaffected and lesion tissue in diseased colonies.

Stephanie M Rosales, Lindsay K Huebner, James S Evans, Amy Apprill, Andrew C Baker, Cynthia C Becker, Anthony J Bellantuono, Marilyn E Brandt, Abigail S Clark, Javier Del Campo and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluating the effect of amoxicillin treatment on the microbiome ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Stephanie M RosalesThe University of Miami, Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, Miami, FL, USA. Stephanie.Rosales@noaa.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2678-9287
Lindsay K HuebnerFlorida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0413-9408
James S EvansU.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9977-1627
Amy ApprillWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4249-2977
Andrew C BakerThe University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science, Department of Marine Biology and Ecology, Miami, FL, USA.
Cynthia C BeckerWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole, MA, USA.
Anthony J BellantuonoFlorida International University, Department of Biological Sciences, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3646-0776
Marilyn E BrandtThe University of the Virgin Islands, Center for Marine and Environmental Studies, St. Thomas, VI, USA.
Abigail S ClarkThe College of the Florida Keys, Marine Science and Technology, Key West, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0191-0933
Javier Del CampoInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC - Universitat Pompeu Fabra)-Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5292-1421
Caroline E DennisonThe University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science, Department of Marine Biology and Ecology, Miami, FL, USA.
Katherine R EatonThe University of Miami, Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, Miami, FL, USA.
Naomi E HuntleyThe Pennsylvania State University, Biology Department, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8245-8212
Christina A KelloggU.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.
Mónica MedinaThe Pennsylvania State University, Biology Department, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8367-0293
Julie L MeyerUniversity of Florida, Soil, Water, and Ecosystem Sciences Department, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3382-3321
Erinn M MullerMote Marine Laboratory, Coral Health and Disease Program, Sarasota, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2695-2064
Mauricio Rodriguez-LanettyFlorida International University, Department of Biological Sciences, Miami, FL, USA.
Jennifer L SalernoGeorge Mason University, Potomac Environmental Research and Education Center, Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Woodbridge, VA, USA.
William B SchillU.S. Geological Survey, Eastern Ecological Science Center, Leetown, WV, USA.
Erin N ShillingHarbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida Atlantic University, Fort Pierce, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1026-6892
Julia Marie StewartThe Pennsylvania State University, Biology Department, University Park, PA, USA.
Joshua D VossHarbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida Atlantic University, Fort Pierce, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0653-2767

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD) has been causing significant whole colony mortality on reefs in Florida and the Caribbean. The cause of SCTLD remains unknown, with the limited concurrence of SCTLD-associated bacteria among studies. We conducted a meta-analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene datasets generated by 16 field and laboratory SCTLD studies to find consistent bacteria associated with SCTLD across disease zones (vulnerable, endemic, and epidemic), coral species, coral compartments (mucus, tissue, and skeleton), and colony health states (apparently healthy colony tissue (AH), and unaffected (DU) and lesion (DL) tissue from diseased colonies). We also evaluated bacteria in seawater and sediment, which may be sources of SCTLD transmission. Although AH colonies in endemic and epidemic zones harbor bacteria associated with SCTLD lesions, and aquaria and field samples had distinct microbial compositions, there were still clear differences in the microbial composition among AH, DU, and DL in the combined dataset. Alpha-diversity between AH and DL was not different; however, DU showed increased alpha-diversity compared to AH, indicating that, prior to lesion formation, corals may undergo a disturbance to the microbiome. This disturbance may be driven by Flavobacteriales, which were especially enriched in DU. In DL, Rhodobacterales and Peptostreptococcales-Tissierellales were prominent in structuring microbial interactions. We also predict an enrichment of an alpha-toxin in DL samples which is typically found in Clostridia. We provide a consensus of SCTLD-associated bacteria prior to and during lesion formation and identify how these taxa vary across studies, coral species, coral compartments, seawater, and sediment.

Identifiers

PMID36894742
PMCPMC9998881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.