Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36894397›Full record

SynthesisVaccine2023

Uptake of Mpox vaccination among transgender people and gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men among sexually-transmitted infection clinic clients in Vancouver, British Columbia.

Mark Gilbert, Aidan Ablona, Hsiu-Ju Chang, Troy Grennan, Michael A Irvine, C Sarai Racey, Travis Salway, Monika Naus, Meena Dawar, Gina Ogilvie

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Vaccine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mark GilbertBC Centre for Disease Control, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: mark.gilbert@bccdc.ca.
Aidan AblonaBC Centre for Disease Control, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Hsiu-Ju ChangBC Centre for Disease Control, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Troy GrennanBC Centre for Disease Control, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Michael A IrvineBC Centre for Disease Control, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
C Sarai RaceySchool of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Travis SalwayBC Centre for Disease Control, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Monika NausBC Centre for Disease Control, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Meena DawarSchool of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Gina OgilvieBC Centre for Disease Control, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAProvincial Health Services Authority · CAVancouver Coastal Health · CA

Funding

CIHR VS1-175518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAs the primary public health strategy for controlling the 2022 Mpox outbreak, it is critical to evaluate the impact of Mpox vaccination campaigns for transgender people and gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (T/GBM). We measured vaccine uptake and associated factors among T/GBM clients of an urban STI clinic in British Columbia (BC).

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional online survey between August 8-22, 2022 of clients who had attended the STI clinic, 5-7 weeks following the first-dose Mpox vaccination campaign in BC. We drew on a systematic review of factors associated with vaccine uptake to develop survey questions, and measured vaccine uptake among vaccine-eligible T/GBM.

resultsOverall, 51% of T/GBM had received the first dose of the vaccine. The sample (331 participants) was majority White and university educated, identified as a man and gay, 10% had trans experience, and 68% met eligibility criteria for vaccination. Among vaccine-eligible participants identifying as T/GBM, 66% had been vaccinated; being unvaccinated was more common among participants identifying as bisexual or heteroflexible/mostly straight, and who spent less time with other T/GBM. Eligible yet unvaccinated participants had lower perceived susceptibility, and reported fewer cues to action (e.g., fewer saw information promoting the vaccine), and increased constraints to vaccine access; vaccine barriers related to accessing clinics and privacy were common. The majority (85%) of those eligible and unvaccinated at time of survey were willing to receive the vaccine.

conclusionIn this sample of STI clinic clients, vaccine uptake among eligible T/GBM was high in the initial weeks following a Mpox vaccination campaign. However, uptake was patterned on social gradients with lower uptake among T/GBM who may be less effectively engaged by available promotion channels. We recommend early, intentional and diverse engagement of T/GBM populations in Mpox and other targeted vaccination programs.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsMpox, MonkeypoxSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexually Transmitted DiseasesSmallpox VaccineTransgender PersonsBritish ColumbiaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleVaccinationSmallpox VaccineGayMen who have sex with menMonkeypoxMpoxTransgenderUptakeVaccine

Identifiers

PMID36894397
PMCPMC9990897
OpenAlexW4323350520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.