Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36894244›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2023

Snacking Behavior and Association with Metabolic Risk Factors in Adults from North and South India.

Anjali Ganpule, Manisha Dubey, Himanshi Pandey, Nikhil Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy, Rosemary Green, Kerry Ann Brown, Avinav Prasad Maddury, Rajesh Khatkar, Prashant Jarhyan, Dorairaj Prabhakaran and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dietary patterns in North and South India: a comparison with EAT-Lancet dietary recommendations.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anjali GanpuleCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: anjali@ccdcindia.org.
Manisha DubeyCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Himanshi PandeyCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Nikhil Srinivasapura VenkateshmurthyCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India; Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Rosemary GreenLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kerry Ann BrownUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Avinav Prasad MadduryPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Rajesh KhatkarPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Prashant JarhyanPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Dorairaj PrabhakaranCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India; Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Sailesh MohanCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India; Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India; Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 205200Wellcome Trust 205200/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSnacks are increasingly contributing to daily diets around the world. Studies from high-income countries have demonstrated the link between snack consumption and metabolic risk factors, but there are very few studies from low- and middle-income countries.

objectivesThe objective of this study was to assess snack behavior and its associations with metabolic risk factors in Indian adults.

methodsAdults from the UDAY study (October 2018-February 2019, n = 8762) from rural and urban Sonipat (North) and Vizag (South) India were studied for snack consumption (food frequency questionnaire), demographic factors, including age, sex, etc. and metabolic risk factors, including BMI, waist circumference, fat percentage, plasma glucose, and blood pressure. We compared snack consumption by categories of sociodemographic factors (Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test) and studied the likelihood for metabolic risk (logistic regression analysis).

resultsHalf of the study participants were women and resided in rural locations. Savory snacks were the most preferred; 50% of the participants consumed them 3-5 times/wk. Participants preferred to purchase out-of-home prepared snacks and eat them at home (86.6%) while watching television (69.4%) or with family/friends (49.3%). The reasons for snacking were hunger, craving, liking, and availability. Snack consumption was higher in Vizag (56.6%) than in Sonipat (43.4%), among women (55.5%) than men (44.5%), and the wealthiest; it was similar in rural-urban locations. Frequent consumers of snacks had 2 times higher likelihood for having obesity (OR: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.51, 3.27) central obesity (OR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.60, 3.45), and higher fat percentage (OR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.31, 2.82) and higher fasting glucose levels (r=0.12 (0.07-0.18) than consumers who consumed snacks rarely (all P ≤ 0.05).

conclusionsSnack (savory and sweet) consumption was high among adults from sexes in both urban and rural locations of north and south India. This was associated with higher risk of obesity. There is a need to improve the food environment by promoting policies for ensuring healthier food options to reduce snacking and associated metabolic risk.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorSnacksAdultDietFemaleHumansMaleObesityRisk FactorsadultsIndiametabolic risksnacking behavior

Identifiers

PMID36894244
PMCPMC7616315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.