Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36894201›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

A mixed-methods study measuring the effectiveness of a menstrual health intervention on menstrual health knowledge, perceptions and practices among young women in Zimbabwe.

Mandikudza Tembo, Helen A Weiss, Leyla Sophie Larsson, Tsitsi Bandason, Nicol Redzo, Ethel Dauya, Tafadzwa Nzanza, Pauline Ishumael, Nancy Gweshe, Precious Ndlovu and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03719521 (Community Based Interventions to Improve HIV Outcomes in Youth), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03719521 nacompletednot on this map

Community Based Interventions to Improve HIV Outcomes in Youth: a Cluster Randomised Trial in Zimbabwe (CHIEDZA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2019 to 2022Enrolled36,991ConditionsHIV InfectionArmsCommunity-based package of integrated HIV, SRH and general health services
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mandikudza TemboDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK Mandikudza.Tembo@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4520-3317
Helen A WeissMRC International Statistics & Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3547-7936
Leyla Sophie LarssonBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0003-4869-4630
Tsitsi BandasonBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Nicol RedzoBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Ethel DauyaBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Tafadzwa NzanzaBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Pauline IshumaelBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Nancy GwesheBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Precious NdlovuBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Chido Dziva ChikwariMRC International Statistics & Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1617-3603
Constancia Vimbayi MavodzaBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Jenny RenjuMRC International Statistics & Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5650-1902
Suzanna C FrancisMRC International Statistics & Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Rashida FerrandBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Constance R S Mackworth-YoungDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9725-7931
Biomedical Research and Training Institute · ZWLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Training for Research Excellence and MeNtorship in Tuberculosis (TRENT)D43TW009539 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI METCALFE, JOHN ZAPATA · 2013 to 2022
$2.9M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009539Wellcome Trust 206316/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWhile integral to women's physical and mental well-being, achieving good menstrual health (MH) remains a challenge for many women. This study investigated the effectiveness of a comprehensive MH intervention on menstrual knowledge, perceptions and practices among women aged 16-24 years in Harare, Zimbabwe.

designA mixed-methods prospective cohort study with pre-post evaluation of an MH intervention.

settingTwo intervention clusters in Harare, Zimbabwe.

participantsOverall, 303 female participants were recruited, of whom 189 (62.4%) were seen at midline (median follow-up 7.0; IQR 5.8-7.7 months) and 184 (60.7%) were seen at endline (median follow-up 12.4; IQR 11.9-13.8 months). Cohort follow-up was greatly affected by COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions.

interventionThe MH intervention provided MH education and support, analgesics, and a choice of menstrual products in a community-based setting to improve MH outcomes among young women in Zimbabwe. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Effectiveness of a comprehensive MH intervention on improving MH knowledge, perceptions, and practices among young women over time. Quantitative questionnaire data were collected at baseline, midline, and endline. At endline, thematic analysis of four focus group discussions was used to further explore participants' menstrual product use and experiences of the intervention.

resultsAt midline, more participants had correct/positive responses for MH knowledge (adjusted OR (aOR)=12.14; 95% CI: 6.8 to 21.8), perceptions (aOR=2.85; 95% CI: 1.6 to 5.1) and practices for reusable pads (aOR=4.68; 95% CI: 2.3 to 9.6) than at baseline. Results were similar comparing endline with baseline for all MH outcomes. Qualitative findings showed that sociocultural norms, stigma and taboos around menstruation, and environmental factors such as limited access to water, sanitation and hygiene facilities affected the effect of the intervention on MH outcomes.

conclusionsThe intervention improved MH knowledge, perceptions and practices among young women in Zimbabwe, and the comprehensive nature of the intervention was key to this. MH interventions should address interpersonal, environmental and societal factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03719521.

Indexed as

COVID-19MenstruationFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPandemicsProspective StudiesZimbabwepublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36894201
PMCPMC10008401
OpenAlexW4323669610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read119
identifiers read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.