Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36893738›Full record

ArticleOncology2023

Patient-Reported Receipt of Oncology Clinician-Delivered Brief Tobacco Treatment (5As) Six Months following Cancer Diagnosis.

Sarah N Price, Jordan M Neil, Melissa Flores, Colin Ponzani, Alona Muzikansky, Lauren Ballini, Jamie S Ostroff, Elyse R Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring Gender Differences in Receipt of the 5As for Smoking Cessation for Recently Diagnosed Cancer Patients (ECOG-ACRIN EAQ171CD).Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. A mixed-methods study exploring free nicotine replacement therapy as a strategy to promote tobacco treatment equity at Cancer Center Cessation Initiative sites.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah N PriceDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Jordan M NeilDepartments of Psychiatry and Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Melissa FloresDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Colin PonzaniDepartments of Psychiatry and Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Alona MuzikanskyDepartments of Psychiatry and Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lauren BalliniDepartment of Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA.
Jamie S OstroffDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Elyse R ParkDepartments of Psychiatry and Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Integrating Tobacco Treatment into Cancer CareR01CA166147 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PARK, ELYSE R. · 2012 to 2016
$3.6M
Cancer Prevention And Control Training Grant (CAPACITY)T32CA122061 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KRISTIE L FOLEY, Kathryn Elizabeth Weaver · 2019 to 2026
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA166147NCI NIH HHS T32 CA122061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSmoking after a cancer diagnosis represents a modifiable health risk. It is recommended that oncology clinicians address tobacco use among their patients using the 5As brief model: Asking about use, Advising users to quit, Assessing willingness to quit, Assisting in quit attempts (counseling and medication), and Arranging follow-up. However, cross-sectional studies have found limited adoption of 5As (especially Assist and Arrange) in oncology settings. Further investigation is needed to understand changes in, and factors associated with, 5As delivery over time.

methodsPatients recently diagnosed with cancer and reporting current smoking (N = 303) enrolled in a smoking cessation clinical trial and completed three longitudinal surveys; at pre-intervention baseline and 3- and 6-month follow-up post-enrollment. Patient-level correlates of 5As receipt at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months were identified using multilevel regression models.

resultsAt baseline, patient-reported rates of 5As receipt from oncology clinicians ranged from 85.17% (Ask) to 32.24% (Arrange). Delivery declined from baseline to 6-month follow-up for all 5As, with the largest declines observed for Ask, Advise, Assess, and Assist-Counseling. Diagnosis of a smoking-related cancer was associated with greater odds of 5As receipt at baseline but lower odds at 6-month follow-up. At each time point, female gender, religiosity, advanced disease, cancer-related stigma, and smoking abstinence were associated with lower odds of 5As receipt, while reporting a recent quit attempt prior to enrollment was associated with higher odds of 5As receipt.

conclusionOncology clinicians' 5As delivery declined over time. Clinician delivery of the 5As varied based on patients' sociodemographics, clinical and smoking characteristics, and psychosocial factors.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSmoking CessationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSmokingCancer patientsOncologistSmoking cessationTobacco treatment

Identifiers

PMID36893738
PMCPMC10563136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.