Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36893480›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2023

Estimating and Assessing Differential Equation Models with Time-Course Data.

Samuel W K Wong, Shihao Yang, S C Kou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel W K WongDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7325-7267
Shihao YangH. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
S C KouDepartment of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1774-3316

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ordinary differential equation (ODE) models are widely used to describe chemical or biological processes. This Article considers the estimation and assessment of such models on the basis of time-course data. Due to experimental limitations, time-course data are often noisy, and some components of the system may not be observed. Furthermore, the computational demands of numerical integration have hindered the widespread adoption of time-course analysis using ODEs. To address these challenges, we explore the efficacy of the recently developed MAGI (MAnifold-constrained Gaussian process Inference) method for ODE inference. First, via a range of examples we show that MAGI is capable of inferring the parameters and system trajectories, including unobserved components, with appropriate uncertainty quantification. Second, we illustrate how MAGI can be used to assess and select different ODE models with time-course data based on MAGI's efficient computation of model predictions. Overall, we believe MAGI is a useful method for the analysis of time-course data in the context of ODE models, which bypasses the need for any numerical integration.

Identifiers

PMID36893480
PMCPMC10041644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.