Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36893376›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2023

Urban-Rural and Socioeconomic Differences in Patient Knowledge and Perceptions of Genomic Tumor Testing.

Jessica F DiBiase, Elizabeth Scharnetzki, Emily Edelman, F Lee Lucas, Petra Helbig, Jens Rueter, Paul K J Han, Erika Ziller, Elizabeth A Jacobs, Eric C Anderson and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06436157 (Genetic Testing Uptake Through an Enhanced Oncology Nurse-Led Intervention in Patients With Solid Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06436157 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Genetic Testing Uptake Through an Enhanced Oncology Nurse-Led Intervention in Patients With Solid Tumors (GENESIS): A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, DavisRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsSolid Tumor, AdultArmsEnhanced education, Usual care education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica F DiBiaseCenter for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME.ORCID 0000-0003-3834-8873
Elizabeth ScharnetzkiCenter for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME.
Emily EdelmanThe Jackson Laboratory, Augusta, ME.
F Lee LucasCenter for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME.
Petra HelbigThe Jackson Laboratory, Augusta, ME.
Jens RueterThe Jackson Laboratory, Augusta, ME.ORCID 0000-0002-9021-025X
Paul K J HanCenter for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME.ORCID 0000-0003-0165-1940
Erika ZillerUniversity of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service, Portland, ME.
Elizabeth A JacobsCenter for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME.ORCID 0000-0002-5549-7718
Eric C AndersonCenter for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME.ORCID 0000-0002-4215-6308
MCGI Working Group
MaineHealth · USJackson Laboratory · USTufts University · USUniversity of Southern Maine · US

Funding

Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (Pilot Supplement)UL1TR002544 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2018 to 2022
$50.2M
CTSA Institutional Mentored Career Development Program (KL2)KL2TR002545 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI FREUND, KAREN · 2018 to 2022
$5.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002545NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSocial determinants of health, such as rurality, income, and education, may widen health disparities by driving variation in patients' knowledge and perceptions of medical interventions. This effect may be greatest for medical technologies that are hard to understand and less accessible. This study explored whether knowledge and perceptions (expectations and attitudes) of patients with cancer toward large-panel genomic tumor testing (GTT), an emerging cancer technology, vary by patient rurality independent of other socioeconomic characteristics (education and income).

methodsPatients with cancer enrolled in a large precision oncology initiative completed surveys measuring rurality, sociodemographic characteristics, and knowledge and perceptions of GTT. We used multivariable linear models to examine differences in GTT knowledge, expectations, and attitudes by patient rurality, education, and income level. Models controlled for age, sex and clinical cancer stage and type.

resultsRural patients had significantly lower knowledge of GTT than urban patients using bivariate models (

conclusionPatients' education and income level are associated with knowledge, expectations, and attitudes toward GTT, whereas rurality is associated with patient expectations. These findings suggest that efforts to promote adoption of GTT should focus on improving knowledge and awareness among individuals with low education and income. These differences may lead to downstream disparities in GTT utilization, which should be explored in future research.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsGenomicsHumansPrecision MedicineSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36893376
PMCPMC10309515
OpenAlexW4323656318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.