Ethics Principles for Artificial Intelligence-Based Telemedicine for Public Health.

Simona Tiribelli, Annabelle Monnot, Syed F H Shah, Anmol Arora, Ping J Toong, Sokanha Kong

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

7citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

Ethical Considerations on Artificial Intelligence, Health and Health Care. All That Glisters Is Not Gold.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026
Review
Advancements in artificial intelligence for atopic dermatitis: diagnosis, treatment, and patient management.Annals of medicine · 2025
Review
The Way Forward to Embrace Artificial Intelligence in Public Health.American journal of public health · 2025
Article
On the ethical and moral dimensions of using artificial intelligence for evidence synthesis.PLOS global public health · 2025
Article
AI reshaping life sciences: intelligent transformation, application challenges, and future convergence in neuroscience, biology, and medicine.Frontiers in digital health · 2025
Review
Rethinking Health Recommender Systems for Active Aging: An Autonomy-Based Ethical Analysis.Science and engineering ethics · 2024
Article
Machine learning models trained on synthetic datasets of multiple sample sizes for the use of predicting blood pressure from clinical data in a national dataset.PloS one · 2023
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

Commented on by
Centering Patients' Voices in Artificial Intelligence‒Based Telemedicine.2023

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simona TiribelliSimona Tiribelli is with the Department of Political Sciences, Communication, and International Relations, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy, and the Institute for Technology and Global Health, Cambridge, MA. Annabelle Monnot is with Polygeia, Global Health Think Tank, Cambridge, UK. Syed F. H. Shah and Anmol Arora are with the School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge. Ping J. Toong is with the Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge. Sokanha Kong is with the Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge.

Annabelle MonnotSimona Tiribelli is with the Department of Political Sciences, Communication, and International Relations, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy, and the Institute for Technology and Global Health, Cambridge, MA. Annabelle Monnot is with Polygeia, Global Health Think Tank, Cambridge, UK. Syed F. H. Shah and Anmol Arora are with the School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge. Ping J. Toong is with the Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge. Sokanha Kong is with the Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge.

Syed F H ShahSimona Tiribelli is with the Department of Political Sciences, Communication, and International Relations, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy, and the Institute for Technology and Global Health, Cambridge, MA. Annabelle Monnot is with Polygeia, Global Health Think Tank, Cambridge, UK. Syed F. H. Shah and Anmol Arora are with the School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge. Ping J. Toong is with the Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge. Sokanha Kong is with the Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge.

Anmol AroraSimona Tiribelli is with the Department of Political Sciences, Communication, and International Relations, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy, and the Institute for Technology and Global Health, Cambridge, MA. Annabelle Monnot is with Polygeia, Global Health Think Tank, Cambridge, UK. Syed F. H. Shah and Anmol Arora are with the School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge. Ping J. Toong is with the Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge. Sokanha Kong is with the Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge.

Ping J ToongSimona Tiribelli is with the Department of Political Sciences, Communication, and International Relations, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy, and the Institute for Technology and Global Health, Cambridge, MA. Annabelle Monnot is with Polygeia, Global Health Think Tank, Cambridge, UK. Syed F. H. Shah and Anmol Arora are with the School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge. Ping J. Toong is with the Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge. Sokanha Kong is with the Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge.

Sokanha KongSimona Tiribelli is with the Department of Political Sciences, Communication, and International Relations, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy, and the Institute for Technology and Global Health, Cambridge, MA. Annabelle Monnot is with Polygeia, Global Health Think Tank, Cambridge, UK. Syed F. H. Shah and Anmol Arora are with the School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge. Ping J. Toong is with the Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge. Sokanha Kong is with the Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of telemedicine has grown exponentially over the past decade, along with the adoption of AI-based telemedicine to support public health systems. Although AI-based telemedicine can open up novel opportunities for the delivery of clinical health and care and become a strong aid to public health systems worldwide, it also comes with ethical risks that should be detected, prevented, or mitigated for the responsible use of AI-based telemedicine in and for public health. However, despite the current proliferation of AI ethics frameworks, thus far, none have been developed for the design of AI-based telemedicine, especially for the adoption of AI-based telemedicine in and for public health. We aimed to fill this gap by mapping the most relevant AI ethics principles for AI-based telemedicine for public health and by showing the need to revise them via major ethical themes emerging from bioethics, medical ethics, and public health ethics toward the definition of a unified set of 6 AI ethics principles for the implementation of AI-based telemedicine. (

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceTelemedicineEthics, MedicalHumansPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID36893365

DOI10.2105/AJPH.2023.307225

PMCPMC10088937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.