Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36893197›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Standardization of flow cytometry and cell sorting to enable a transcriptomic analysis in a multi-site sarcoidosis study.

Roman E Magallon, Laura D Harmacek, Nicholas K Arger, Pineet Grewal, Linda Powers, Brenda R Werner, Briana Q Barkes, Li Li, Kristyn MacPhail, May Gillespie and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Online survey on existing sarcoidosis registries and biobanks: an ERN lung initiative.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2024
    Article
  3. Applications of Flow Cytometry in Drug Discovery and Translational Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Roman E MagallonCenter for Genes, Environment, & Health, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Laura D HarmacekCenter for Genes, Environment, & Health, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5603-4857
Nicholas K ArgerDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Pineet GrewalDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Linda PowersDepartment of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.
Brenda R WernerDepartment of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.
Briana Q BarkesDivision of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Li LiDivision of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Kristyn MacPhailDivision of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
May GillespieDivision of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Elizabeth K WhiteDepartment of Immunology and Genomic Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Sarah E CollinsDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Talyor BrownDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Jessica CardenasDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Edward S ChenDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0723-8209
Lisa A MaierDivision of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Sonia M LeachCenter for Genes, Environment, & Health, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Nabeel Y HamzehDepartment of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.
Laura L KothDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Brian P O'ConnorCenter for Genes, Environment, & Health, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
National Jewish Health · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USPulmonary and Critical Care Associates · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

The Impact of Environmental Exposures on Sarcoidosis Incidence and MortalityR01HL157533 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Wonder P. Drake, Connie C. W. Hsia · 2022 to 2026
$5.7M
A Prospective Study of T cell Immune-phenotype and Disease Outcome in Pulmonary SarcoidosisR01HL136681 · NHLBI · NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH · PI HAMZEH, NABEEL, KOTH, LAURA L · 2018 to 2021
$4.0M
Using high T-bet-expressing cells and Serum Chemokines as Indicators of Disease Severity in SarcoidosisK23HL156000 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ARGER, NICHOLAS KOSTANDINOS · 2021 to 2025
$899k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL156000NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136681NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL157533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contribution and regulation of various CD4+ T cell lineages that occur with remitting vs progressive courses in sarcoidosis are poorly understood. We developed a multiparameter flow cytometry panel to sort these CD4+ T cell lineages followed by measurement of their functional potential using RNA-sequencing analysis at six-month intervals across multiple study sites. To obtain good quality RNA for sequencing, we relied on chemokine receptor expression to identify and sort lineages. To minimize gene expression changes induced by perturbations of T cells and avoid protein denaturation caused by freeze/thaw cycles, we optimized our protocols using freshly isolated samples at each study site. To accomplish this study, we had to overcome significant standardization challenges across multiple sites. Here, we detail standardization considerations for cell processing, flow staining, data acquisition, sorting parameters, and RNA quality control analysis that were performed as part of the NIH-sponsored, multi-center study, BRonchoscopy at Initial sarcoidosis diagnosis Targeting longitudinal Endpoints (BRITE). After several rounds of iterative optimization, we identified the following aspects as critical for successful standardization: 1) alignment of PMT voltages across sites using CS&T/rainbow bead technology; 2) a single template created in the cytometer program that was used by all sites to gate cell populations during data acquisition and cell sorting; 3) use of standardized lyophilized flow cytometry staining cocktails to reduce technical error during processing; 4) development and implementation of a standardized Manual of Procedures. After standardization of cell sorting, we were able to determine the minimum number of sorted cells necessary for next generation sequencing through analysis of RNA quality and quantity from sorted T cell populations. Overall, we found that implementing a multi-parameter cell sorting with RNA-seq analysis clinical study across multiple study sites requires iteratively tested standardized procedures to ensure comparable and high-quality results.

Indexed as

RNATranscriptomeCell SeparationFlow CytometryReference StandardsRNA

Identifiers

PMID36893197
PMCPMC9997938
OpenAlexW4323653574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.