Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36893155›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2023

Transition between preclinical and clinical training: Perception of dental students regarding the adoption of ergonomic principles.

Júlia Carrer Hallak, Franciele de Souza Ferreira, Caroline Anselmi de Oliveira, Júlia Margato Pazos, Tamíris da Costa Neves, Patrícia Petromilli Nordi Sasso Garcia

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Júlia Carrer HallakDepartment of Social Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8210-9098
Franciele de Souza FerreiraDepartment of Social Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
Caroline Anselmi de OliveiraDepartment of Morphology and Children's Clinic, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
Júlia Margato PazosDepartment of Social Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
Tamíris da Costa NevesDepartment of Social Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
Patrícia Petromilli Nordi Sasso GarciaDepartment of Social Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4607-5975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the perceptions of third-year dental students regarding the application of ergonomic principles in the transition between preclinical and clinical training in Restorative Dentistry.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative observational cross-sectional study. The sample consisted of forty-six third-year dental students at São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Dentistry, Araraquara. Data was collected using an individual interview recorded on a digital voice recorder. A script containing questions related to the process of adaptation of students to clinical care with a view to ergonomic work posture was used. Data analysis was based on the quali-quantitative technique of Discourse of the Collective Subject (DCS), using Qualiquantisoft®.

resultsMost students (97.80%) perceived the need for an adaptation period in the transition from the preclinic to the clinic regarding ergonomic posture requirements; a part of them (45.65%) claimed that they still could not adapt, primarily due to the difference between the laboratory and clinic in the workstation (50.00%). Some students suggested longer preclinical training in a clinical environment to facilitate this transition (21.74%). The dental stool (32.60%) and the dental chair (21.74%) were the external factors that contributed most to making this transition difficult. The difficulty of the restorative dentistry procedure (10.87%) also interfered with posture. Additionally, the most challenging ergonomic posture requirements in the transition period were maintaining 30 to 40 cm between the patient's mouth and operator's eyes (45.65%), positioning the patient in the dental chair correctly (15.22%), and working with the elbows close to the body (15.22%).

conclusionMost students perceived the need for an adaptation period in the preclinical transition to the clinic, attributing difficulties to adopt the ergonomic posture requirements, to use the workstation and to perform the procedures on real patients.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsStudents, DentalBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPerception

Identifiers

PMID36893155
PMCPMC9997885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.