ArticlePloS one2023
Predictive simulation of single-leg landing scenarios for ACL injury risk factors evaluation.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantifying Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Resilience: A Screening and Composite Score Framework.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Can lateral tenodesis improve the rotational stability of the ACL reconstruction? A finite element analysis.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) rupture is a very common knee injury during sport activities. Landing after jump is one of the most prominent human body movements that can lead to such an injury. The landing-related ACL injury risk factors have been in the spotlight of research interest. Over the years, researchers and clinicians acquire knowledge about human movement during daily-life activities by organizing complex in vivo studies that feature high complexity, costs and technical and most importantly physical challenges. In an attempt to overcome these limitations, this paper introduces a computational modeling and simulation pipeline that aims to predict and identify key parameters of interest that are related to ACL injury during single-leg landings. We examined the following conditions: a) landing height, b) hip internal and external rotation, c) lumbar forward and backward leaning, d) lumbar medial and lateral bending, e) muscle forces permutations and f) effort goal weight. Identified on related research studies, we evaluated the following risk factors: vertical Ground Reaction Force (vGRF), knee joint Anterior force (AF), Medial force (MF), Compressive force (CF), Abduction moment (AbdM), Internal rotation moment (IRM), quadricep and hamstring muscle forces and Quadriceps/Hamstrings force ratio (Q/H force ratio). Our study clearly demonstrated that ACL injury is a rather complicated mechanism with many associated risk factors which are evidently correlated. Nevertheless, the results were mostly in agreement with other research studies regarding the ACL risk factors. The presented pipeline showcased promising potential of predictive simulations to evaluate different aspects of complicated phenomena, such as the ACL injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.