Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36893089›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Wayfinding and path integration deficits detected using a virtual reality mobile app in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Caroline Seton, Antoine Coutrot, Michael Hornberger, Hugo J Spiers, Rebecca Knight, Caroline Whyatt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Tell me why: the missing w in episodic memory's what, where, and when.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Caroline SetonDepartment of Psychology, Sport and Geography, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3868-6477
Antoine CoutrotLaboratoire d'InfoRmatique en Image et Systèmes d'information, French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Michael HornbergerApplied Dementia Research, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Hugo J SpiersDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rebecca KnightDepartment of Psychology, Sport and Geography, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9400-9377
Caroline WhyattDepartment of Psychology, Sport and Geography, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
University of Hertfordshire · GBUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity College London · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to navigate is supported by a wide network of brain areas which are particularly vulnerable to disruption brain injury, including traumatic brain injury (TBI). Wayfinding and the ability to orient back to the direction you have recently come (path integration) may likely be impacted in daily life but have so far not been tested with patients with TBI. Here, we assessed spatial navigation in thirty-eight participants, fifteen of whom had a history of TBI, and twenty-three control participants. Self-estimated spatial navigation ability was assessed using the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction (SBSOD) scale. No significant difference between TBI patients and a control group was identified. Rather, results indicated that both participant groups demonstrated 'good' self-inferred spatial navigational ability on the SBSOD scale. Objective navigation ability was tested via the virtual mobile app test Sea Hero Quest (SHQ), which has been shown to predict real-world navigation difficulties and assesses (a) wayfinding across several environments and (b) path integration. Compared to a sub-sample of 13 control participants, a matched subsample of 10 TBI patients demonstrated generally poorer performance on all wayfinding environments tested. Further analysis revealed that TBI participants consistently spent a shorter duration viewing a map prior to navigating to goals. Patients showed mixed performance on the path integration task, with poor performance evident when proximal cues were absent. Our results provide preliminary evidence that TBI impacts both wayfinding and, to some extent, path integration. The findings suggest long-lasting clinical difficulties experienced in TBI patients affect both wayfinding and to some degree path integration ability.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticMobile ApplicationsSpatial NavigationVirtual RealityBrainHumans

Identifiers

PMID36893089
PMCPMC9997943
OpenAlexW4323652975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.