Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36893087›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Designing an exploratory phase 2b platform trial in NASH with correlated, co-primary binary endpoints.

Elias Laurin Meyer, Peter Mesenbrink, Nicholas A Di Prospero, Juan M Pericàs, Ekkehard Glimm, Vlad Ratziu, Elena Sena, Franz König, EU-PEARL NASH Investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elias Laurin MeyerCenter for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5398-6334
Peter MesenbrinkNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, One Health Plaza, East Hanover, NJ, United States of America.
Nicholas A Di ProsperoJanssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ, United States of America.
Juan M PericàsLiver Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute for Research (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Ekkehard GlimmNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Vlad RatziuAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitie-Salpetriere, University of Paris, Paris, France.
Elena SenaLiver Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute for Research (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Franz KönigCenter for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6893-3304
EU-PEARL NASH Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the progressive form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and a disease with high unmet medical need. Platform trials provide great benefits for sponsors and trial participants in terms of accelerating drug development programs. In this article, we describe some of the activities of the EU-PEARL consortium (EU Patient-cEntric clinicAl tRial pLatforms) regarding the use of platform trials in NASH, in particular the proposed trial design, decision rules and simulation results. For a set of assumptions, we present the results of a simulation study recently discussed with two health authorities and the learnings from these meetings from a trial design perspective. Since the proposed design uses co-primary binary endpoints, we furthermore discuss the different options and practical considerations for simulating correlated binary endpoints.

Indexed as

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseAdaptive Clinical Trials as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicEndpoint DeterminationHumansResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID36893087
PMCPMC9997886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.