Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36892884›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2023

Positive affect treatment targets reward sensitivity: A randomized controlled trial.

Michelle G Craske, Alicia E Meuret, Aileen Echiverri-Cohen, David Rosenfield, Thomas Ritz

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
26.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06388304 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study of Positive Affect Training for Endocrine Therapy Medication Adherence

TypeinterventionalSponsorJoanna ArchRan2024 to 2025Enrolled39ConditionsBreast Cancer, DCISArmsTHRIVE Online PAT Program
NCT06564402 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Augmentation of Exposure Using Positive Mental Rehearsal in Individuals With Increased Social Anxiety

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilipps University MarburgRan2024 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsSocial Anxiety, Social PhobiaArmsPositive Mental Rehearsal, Mental Rehearsal, Exposure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Brain Activation Associated With Response to Psychotherapies for Late-Life Depression: A Task-Based fMRI Study.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle G CraskeDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.ORCID 0000-0002-3704-5240
Alicia E MeuretDepartment of Psychology, Southern Methodist University.
Aileen Echiverri-CohenDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.
David RosenfieldDepartment of Psychology, Southern Methodist University.
Thomas RitzDepartment of Psychology, Southern Methodist University.
Southern Methodist University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Reward Sensitivity as a Mechanism of Positive Affect Treatment for AnhedoniaR33MH115138 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CRASKE, MICHELLE G, MEURET, ALICIA ESPERANZA · 2021 to 2023
$2.4M
Reward Sensitivity as a Mechanism of Positive Affect Treatment for AnhedoniaR61MH115138 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CRASKE, MICHELLE G, MEURET, ALICIA ESPERANZA · 2018 to 2019
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS R33 MH115138NIMH NIH HHS R61 MH115138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDetermine whether a novel psychosocial treatment for positive affect improves clinical status and reward sensitivity more than a form of cognitive behavioral therapy that targets negative affect and whether improvements in reward sensitivity correlate with improvements in clinical status.

methodIn this assessor-blinded, parallel-group, multisite, two-arm randomized controlled clinical superiority trial, 85 treatment-seeking adults with severely low positive affect, moderate-to-severe depression or anxiety, and functional impairment received 15 weekly individual therapy sessions of positive affect treatment (PAT) or negative affect treatment (NAT). Clinical status measures were self-reported positive affect, interviewer-rated anhedonia, and self-reported depression and anxiety. Target measures were eleven physiological, behavioral, cognitive, and self-report measures of reward anticipation-motivation, response to reward attainment, and reward learning. All analyses were intent-to-treat.

resultsCompared to NAT, individuals receiving PAT achieved superior improvements in the multivariate clinical status measures at posttreatment,

conclusionsTargeting positive affect results in superior improvements in clinical status and reward sensitivity than targeting negative affect. This is the first demonstration of differential target engagement across two psychological interventions for anxious or depressed individuals with low positive affect. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressive DisorderAdultAnhedoniaHumansPsychotherapyReward

Identifiers

PMID36892884
PMCPMC10213148
OpenAlexW4323653541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.