Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36892802›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2025

Stellate ganglia stimulation counteracts vagal stimulation by significantly increasing heart rate and blood pressure.

Ammar M Killu, Mei Yang, Niyada Naksuk, Jason Tri, Xuping Li, Roshini Asirvatham, Samuel J Asirvatham, Yong-Mei Cha

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ammar M Killu *Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Mei Yang *Department of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, 1665 Kongjiang Rd, Yangpu Qu, Shanghai Shi, 200000, China.
Niyada NaksukDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Jason TriDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Xuping LiDepartment of Cardiovascular medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Roshini AsirvathamDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Samuel J AsirvathamDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Yong-Mei ChaDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. ycha@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5897-9464
Mayo Clinic · USCentral South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVasovagal syncope (VVS) is the leading cause of syncope. The most frequent mechanism is that of a cardioinhibitory response, vasodepressor response, or mixture of both. Neural stimulation that negates or overcomes the effects of vagal tone may be used as a treatment strategy for VVS.

methodsSix male canines were studied. Stimulation (10-Hz, 2 ms pulse duration, 2 min duration) of the cervical vagus (CV), thoracic vagus (TV), and stellate ganglia (SG) was performed using needle electrodes at 3 V, 5 V, and 10 V output. SG stimulation at an output of 10 V overlaying TV stimulation at the same output was performed. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and cardiac output (CO) were measured before, during, and after stimulation.

resultsRight cervical vagal stimulation was associated with significant hemodynamic changes. HR, SBP, and DBP were reduced (107 ± 16 vs. 78 ± 15 bpm [P < 0.0001], 116 ± 24 vs. 107 ± 28 mmHg [P = 0.002] and 71 ± 18 vs. 58 ± 20 mmHg [P < 0.0001]), respectively, while left cervical vagal stimulation had minimal changes. CV stimulation was associated with greater hemodynamic changes than TV stimulation. Left and right SG stimulation significantly increased systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and HR at 5 V and 10 V, which could be observed within 30 s after stimulation. An output-dependent increase in hemodynamic parameters was seen with both left and right SG stimulation. No difference between left and right SG stimulation was seen. SG stimulation overlay significantly increased HR, BP, and CO from baseline vagal stimulation bilaterally.

conclusionsStellate ganglia stimulation leads to increased HR and BP despite significant vagal stimulation. This may be exploited therapeutically in the management of vasovagal syncope.

Indexed as

Blood PressureHeart RateStellate GanglionSyncope, VasovagalVagus Nerve StimulationAnimalsDogsMaleTreatment OutcomeVagus NerveAutonomicsHemodynamicsParasympatheticStellate ganglionSympatheticVagus

Identifiers

PMID36892802
OpenAlexW4323652382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.