Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36892779›Full record

Observational studyJournal of epidemiology and global health2023

Effect of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions on COVID-19 in Rwanda: An Observational Study.

Edson Rwagasore, Olivier Nsekuye, Alfred Rutagengwa, Ziad El-Khatib

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of epidemiology and global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Edson RwagasoreEmergency Preparedness and Response Division (PHS&EPR), Public Health Surveillance, Rwanda Biomedical Center (RBC), PO Box 7162, Kigali, Rwanda.
Olivier NsekuyeEmergency Preparedness and Response Division (PHS&EPR), Public Health Surveillance, Rwanda Biomedical Center (RBC), PO Box 7162, Kigali, Rwanda.
Alfred RutagengwaWorld Health Organization Rwanda Country Office, PO Box 1324, Kigali, Rwanda.
Ziad El-KhatibDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Solna, Sweden. ziad.el-khatib@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0003-0756-7280
Rwanda Biomedical Center · RWKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOn 11 March 2020, COVID-19 was declared as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). The first case was identified in Rwanda on 24 March 2020. Three waves of COVID-19 outbreak have been observed since the identification of the first case in Rwanda. During the COVID-19 epidemic, the country of Rwanda has implemented many Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) that appear to be effective. However, a study was needed to investigate the effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions applied in Rwanda to guide ongoing and future responses to epidemics of this emerging disease across the World.

methodsA quantitative observational study was conducted by conducting analysis of COVID-19 cases reported daily in Rwanda from 24 March 2020 to 21 November 2021. Data used were obtained from the official Twitter account of Ministry Health and the website of Rwanda Biomedical Center. Frequencies of COVID-19 cases and incidence rates were calculated, and to determine the effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions on changes in COVID-19 cases an interrupted time series analysis was used.

resultsRwanda has experienced three waves of COVID-19 outbreak from March 2020 to November 2021. The major NPIs applied in Rwanda included lockdowns, movement restriction among districts and Kigali City, and curfews. Of 100,217 COVID-19 confirmed cases as of 21 November 2021, the majority were female 51,671 (52%) and 25,713 (26%) were in the age group of 30-39, and 1866 (1%) were imported cases. The case fatality rate was high among men (n = 724/48,546; 1.5%), age > 80 (n = 309/1866; 17%) and local cases (n = 1340/98,846; 1.4%). The interrupted time series analysis revealed that during the first wave NPIs decreased the number of COVID-19 cases by 64 cases per week. NPIs applied in the second wave decreased COVID-19 cases by 103 per week after implementation, while in the third wave after NPIs implementation, a significant decrease of 459 cases per week was observed.

conclusionThe early implementation of lockdown, restriction of movements and putting in place curfews may reduce the transmission of COVID-19 across the country. The NPIs implemented in Rwanda appear to be effectively containing the COVID-19 outbreak. Additionally, setting up the NPIs early is important to prevent further spread of the virus.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultCommunicable Disease ControlDisease OutbreaksFemaleHumansMalePandemicsRwandaCOVID-19Global healthNon-pharmaceutical interventionsRwanda

Identifiers

PMID36892779
PMCPMC9996547
OpenAlexW4323652697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.