ArticleDermatology and therapy2023
Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab for the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03926169 (A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Risankizumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Risankizumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of tumor necrosis factor-α blockers, anti-interleukins, and small molecule inhibitors for dissecting cellulitis of the scalp treatment.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Pooled it
- European S2k guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa part 2: Treatment.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025Guideline
- Australasian hidradenitis suppurativa management guidelines.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2025Guideline
- Position Statement of the EADV Task Forces With External Experts on Quality of Life Measurement in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Update.International journal of dermatology · 2026Review
- Symposium on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Advances 2025 Proceedings.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Review
- The IL-23/IL-17 axis in Behçet's syndrome pathogenesis: from immunological perspectives to therapeutic implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Type 17 T-cell subset divergence in hidradenitis suppurativa versus psoriasis: a comparative single-cell transcriptomic analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa in Special Populations: A Narrative Review.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Review
- Concordance of DLQI and pain score in hidradenitis suppurativa clinical trials: a systematic review.International journal of women's dermatology · 2025Article
- Hidradenitis suppurativa: key insights into treatment success and failure.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024Article
- Anti-IL-17/23 Drugs for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa in Patients With Concomitant Psoriasis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2024Article
- Essentials of hidradenitis suppurativa: a comprehensive review of diagnostic and treatment perspectives.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Understanding of Genetic Factors and Treatment.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Secukinumab in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients Who Failed Adalimumab: A 52-Week Real-Life Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024Article
- Transcriptomic Analysis of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Unique Molecular Signature with Broad Immune Activation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Single-cell transcriptomics suggest distinct upstream drivers of IL-17A/F in hidradenitis versus psoriasis.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2023Article
- Emerging Treatments and the Clinical Trial Landscape for Hidradenitis Suppurativa Part I: Topical and Systemic Medical Therapies.Dermatology and therapy · 2023Review
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa and JAK Inhibitors: A Review of the Published Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Guselkumab, Risankizumab, and Tildrakizumab in the Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review of Existing Trials and Real-Life Data.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2023Review
- The paradigm of IL-23-independent production of IL-17F and IL-17A and their role in chronic inflammatory diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, immune-mediated skin condition characterized by inflammatory lesions that can cause pain, impaired physical activity, and reduced quality of life. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of risankizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that specifically inhibits interleukin 23 by binding to its p19 subunit, for the treatment of HS.
methodsThis phase II multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study investigated the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe HS. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous risankizumab 180 mg; risankizumab 360 mg; or placebo at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, and 12. Patients initially randomized to placebo received blinded risankizumab 360 mg at weeks 16, 17, and 18; patients initially randomized to risankizumab received blinded matching placebo at the same time points. From weeks 20-60, all patients received open-label risankizumab 360 mg every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the achievement of HS Clinical Response (HiSCR) at week 16. Safety was assessed by monitoring of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
resultsA total of 243 patients were randomized (risankizumab 180 mg, n = 80; risankizumab 360 mg, n = 81; placebo, n = 82). HiSCR was achieved by 46.8% of patients with risankizumab 180 mg, 43.4% with risankizumab 360 mg, and 41.5% with placebo at week 16. The primary endpoint was not met, and the study was terminated early. Incidence of TEAEs, severe TEAEs, TEAEs considered possibly related to study drug, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug were generally low and comparable across treatment groups.
conclusionRisankizumab does not appear to be an efficacious treatment for moderate-to-severe HS. Future studies to understand the complex molecular mechanisms underlying HS pathogenesis and develop improved therapies are warranted.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03926169.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.