Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36892727›Full record

ArticlePsychometrika2023

Detecting Changes in Correlation Networks with Application to Functional Connectivity of fMRI Data.

Changryong Baek, Benjamin Leinwand, Kristen A Lindquist, Seok-Oh Jeong, Joseph Hopfinger, Katheleen M Gates, Vladas Pipiras

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychometrika, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Changryong BaekSungkyunkwan University, 25-2 Sungkyunkwan-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 03063, South Korea. crbaek@skku.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1839-404X
Benjamin LeinwandStevens institute of technology, Hoboken, USA.
Kristen A LindquistUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Seok-Oh JeongHankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, South Korea.
Joseph HopfingerUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Katheleen M GatesUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Vladas PipirasUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research questions in the human sciences often seek to answer if and when a process changes across time. In functional MRI studies, for instance, researchers may seek to assess the onset of a shift in brain state. For daily diary studies, the researcher may seek to identify when a person's psychological process shifts following treatment. The timing and presence of such a change may be meaningful in terms of understanding state changes. Currently, dynamic processes are typically quantified as static networks where edges indicate temporal relations among nodes, which may be variables reflecting emotions, behaviors, or brain activity. Here we describe three methods for detecting changes in such correlation networks from a data-driven perspective. Networks here are quantified using the lag-0 pair-wise correlation (or covariance) estimates as the representation of the dynamic relations among variables. We present three methods for change point detection: dynamic connectivity regression, max-type method, and a PCA-based method. The change point detection methods each include different ways to test if two given correlation network patterns from different segments in time are significantly different. These tests can also be used outside of the change point detection approaches to test any two given blocks of data. We compare the three methods for change point detection as well as the complementary significance testing approaches on simulated and empirical functional connectivity fMRI data examples.

Indexed as

Brain MappingMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainHumansNeural PathwaysPsychometricsblock multiplier bootstrapcorrelationscovariancesdynamic factor modelshigh-dimensional time serieshypothesis testsnetworksprincipal components

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.