Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36892672›Full record

ArticleBulletin of experimental biology and medicine2023

Nootropic Activity of Prospekta in a Blind Placebo-Controlled Study in a Model of Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Rats.

E V Kardash, N V Petrova, G R Khakimova, S A Tarasov, O I Epstein, G Peyon, E Esneault

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effect of Frequency of Prospekta Administration: Anxiolytic Effect in Wistar Rats.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

E V KardashResearch Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology, Moscow, Russia. physactive@yandex.ru.
N V PetrovaResearch Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology, Moscow, Russia.
G R KhakimovaLLC "MATERIA MEDICA HOLDING", Moscow, Russia.
S A TarasovResearch Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology, Moscow, Russia.
O I EpsteinResearch Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology, Moscow, Russia.
G PeyonPorsolt and Partners Pharmacology, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France.
E EsneaultPorsolt and Partners Pharmacology, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France.
Research Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology, the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences · RUPorsolt (France) · FRExpedia Group (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of the pharmacological activity of the original drug Prospekta in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemia revealed its nootropic effect: course treatment in the post-ischemic period led to recovery of the neurological status of animals at the peak of neurological deficit. Evaluation of the therapeutic potential of the drug in morphological and functional CNS disorders allowed us to conclude that it is advisable to carry out further studies of its biological activity at the preclinical stage (the results obtained in animals were successfully confirmed in a clinical trial of drug efficacy in the treatment of moderate cognitive disorders in the early recovery period after ischemic stroke). Studies of the nootropic activity in other pathologies of the nervous system are also promising.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaIschemic StrokeNootropic AgentsStrokeAnimalsCerebral InfarctionRatsNootropic Agentsmodel of ischemic strokenootropic activityProspekta

Identifiers

PMID36892672
OpenAlexW4323652832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.