Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36892627›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2023

Outcomes of high-risk adult outpatients treated with early remdesivir therapy during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) omicron era: experiences from the national centre of Hungary.

Zsófia Gáspár, Bálint Gergely Szabó, Anita Ábrahám, Zsuzsanna Várnai, Noémi Kiss-Dala, János Szlávik, János Sinkó, István Vályi-Nagy, Botond Lakatos

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zsófia GáspárSchool of PhD Studies, Semmelweis University, Üllői Street 26., 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
Bálint Gergely SzabóSchool of PhD Studies, Semmelweis University, Üllői Street 26., 1085, Budapest, Hungary. szabo.balint.gergely@gmail.com.
Anita ÁbrahámNational Institute of Haematology and Infectious Diseases, South Pest Central Hospital, Albert Flórián Street 5-7., 1097, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsuzsanna VárnaiNational Institute of Haematology and Infectious Diseases, South Pest Central Hospital, Albert Flórián Street 5-7., 1097, Budapest, Hungary.
Noémi Kiss-DalaSchool of PhD Studies, Semmelweis University, Üllői Street 26., 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
János SzlávikNational Institute of Haematology and Infectious Diseases, South Pest Central Hospital, Albert Flórián Street 5-7., 1097, Budapest, Hungary.
János SinkóSchool of PhD Studies, Semmelweis University, Üllői Street 26., 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
István Vályi-NagyNational Institute of Haematology and Infectious Diseases, South Pest Central Hospital, Albert Flórián Street 5-7., 1097, Budapest, Hungary.
Botond LakatosSchool of PhD Studies, Semmelweis University, Üllői Street 26., 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HUNational Public Health and Medical Officer Service · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that remdesivir might improve clinical outcome of high-risk outpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our aim was to evaluate characteristics and outcomes of nonhospitalised adults diagnosed with COVID-19 and treated with early remdesivir therapy during the omicron wave. A single-centre prospective cohort study was performed among adult patients between February and June 2022, during the circulation of phylogenetic assignment of named global outbreak (PANGO) subvariants BA.2, BA.4, and BA.5 in Hungary. Patients were enrolled based on pre-defined criteria. Clinical characteristics (demography, comorbidities, vaccination status, imaging, treatment, and disease course) and outcomes (COVID-19 related hospitalisation, oxygen supplementation, intensive care support, and all-cause death) were assessed at 28 days post-treatment. A subgroup analysis of patients with and without active haematological malignancies was also carried out. Altogether, 127 patients were enrolled: 51.2% (65/127) were female with a median age of 59 (IQR: 22, range: 21‒92) years, and 48.8% (62/127) had active haematological malignancy. At 28 days post-treatment, 7.1% (9/127) of patients required COVID-19-related hospitalisation, 2.4% (3/127) required oxygen supplementation, 1.6% (2/127) required intensive care, and 0.8% (1/127) died due to a non-COVID-19-related secondary infection at the intensive care unit, all with haematological malignancies. Early remdesivir treatment might be a feasible strategy among high-risk outpatients with COVID-19 during the omicron wave.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hematologic NeoplasmsAdenosine MonophosphateAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlanineCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentFemaleHumansHungaryMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsPhylogenyProspective StudiesAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineremdesivirCoronavirus disease 2019COVID-19DrugOmicronOutpatientRemdesivirSARS-CoV-2Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Identifiers

PMID36892627
PMCPMC9995722
OpenAlexW4323653408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.