Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36892602›Full record

ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[What does the general and abdominal surgeon need to know about oncologically oriented radiotherapy?]

Jörg Andreas Müller, Simon Trommer, Frank Meyer, Katharina Lampe, Roland S Croner, Dirk Vordermark, Daniel Medenwald

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    2023
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jörg Andreas MüllerUniversitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
Simon TrommerUniversitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
Frank MeyerKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Gefäß- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg A. ö. R., Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland. frank.meyer@med.ovgu.de.
Katharina LampeUniversitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
Roland S CronerKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Gefäß- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg A. ö. R., Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
Dirk VordermarkUniversitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
Daniel MedenwaldUniversitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
University Hospital in Halle · DEKlinikum Magdeburg · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiotherapy is an integral component of most modern multimodal tumor treatment concepts, both in palliative and curative situations and intentions. This also applies to many tumor entities relevant in general as well as abdominal surgery. This can give rise to new challenges in the context of the daily clinical routine and interdisciplinary tumor conferences.

aimPractice relevant overview, based on selective references from the current scientific literature in medicine and own experiences obtained in daily work, for the oncological surgeon on radiotherapy-associated options for visceral tumor lesions. A particular focus is on rectal cancer, esophageal cancer, anal cancer and liver metastases.

methodA narrative review is given. RESULTS (SELECTED CORNER POINTS): In total neoadjuvant therapy it is possible to avoid resection in rectal cancer if a good response is achieved and close monitoring can be provided. In esophageal cancer neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by resection can be considered the therapeutic regimen of choice for all suitable patients. If surgery is not an option, definitive chemoradiotherapy is an appropriate and favorable alternative, especially with respect to squamous cell carcinoma. Even taking the latest data on the topic into account, definitive chemoradiotherapy remains undisputedly recommended for anal cancer. Liver tumors can be locally ablated by stereotactic radiotherapy.

conclusionClose cooperation between disciplines in the context of tumor therapy remains essential for the best possible treatment and outcome of patients.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsSurgeonsChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyAnal cancerEsophageal cancerLiver metastasesMultimodal tumor treatment conceptsRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID36892602
PMCPMC10156816
OpenAlexW4323652867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.