ArticleDermatology practical & conceptual2023
International Dermoscopy Society (IDS) Criteria for Skin Tumors: Validation for Skin of Color Through a Delphi Expert Consensus by the "Imaging in Skin of Color" IDS Task Force.
Article in Dermatology practical & conceptual, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dermoscopy of Cutaneous Melanoma Metastases: A Comprehensive Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Dermoscopic characteristics of Merkel cell carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2024Review
- Dermoscopy Use in Africa: Determinants and Challenges.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2024Article
- Skin of color representation in dermoscopy studies distinguishing benign from malignant skin lesions: A scoping review.JAAD international · 2023Article
- Race-Specific and Skin of Color Dermatoscopic Characteristics of Skin Cancer: A Literature Review.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2023Review
- Dermoscopy of Cutaneous Neoplasms in Skin of Color - A Systematic review by the International Dermoscopy Society "Imaging in Skin of Color" Task Force.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2023Review
- Dermoscopy in Skin of Color: The Journey So Far.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 16 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA structured set of eight basic dermoscopic parameters (lines, clods, dots, circles, pseudopods, structureless, else, and vessels) including a total of 77 variables with corresponding descriptive and metaphoric vocabulary has been released for evaluation of skin tumors by the International Dermoscopy Society (IDS).
objectivesTo validate the aforementioned criteria for the use in darker phototypes (phototypes IV-VI) via an expert consensus.
methodsThe two-round "Delphi method" was adopted, with an iterative process including two rounds of email questionnaires. Potential panelists were asked to take part in the procedure via email on the basis of their expertise in the dermoscopy of skin tumors in dark phototypes.
resultsA total of 17 participants were involved. All the original variables of the eight basic parameters reached agreement during the first round, except for "pink small clods" ("milky red globules") and "structureless pink zone" ("milky red areas"). Moreover, during the first round, panelists proposed a change of three existing items and the introduction of four new items, i.e., "black, small clods" ("black globules"), "follicular plugs", "erosions/ulcerations", and "white color around vessels" ("perivascular white halo"). All such proposals achieved agreement, thus being included in the final list, for a total of 79 items. There was consistency between the descriptive and metaphoric approaches in terms of scoring.
conclusionsAlbeit most of the original items were considered applicable even for skin of color, there are some points of differences that physicians need to know. No significant preference was found between descriptive and metaphoric terminology among panelists.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.