Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36892291›Full record

ArticlemBio2023

SARS-CoV-2 Exposure in Norway Rats (Rattus norvegicus) from New York City.

Yang Wang, Julianna Lenoch, Dennis Kohler, Thomas J DeLiberto, Cynthia Y Tang, Tao Li, Yizhi Jane Tao, Minhui Guan, Susan Compton, Caroline Zeiss and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A clue to clarify the origin of Omicron.Royal Society open science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Generation and characterization of a humanizedFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yang WangCenter for Influenza and Emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Julianna LenochUSDA APHIS Wildlife Services National Wildlife Disease Program, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Dennis KohlerUSDA APHIS Wildlife Services National Wildlife Disease Program, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Thomas J DeLibertoUSDA APHIS Wildlife Services, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Cynthia Y TangCenter for Influenza and Emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5272-7170
Tao LiViral Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Yizhi Jane TaoDepartment of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0149-2241
Minhui GuanCenter for Influenza and Emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3442-1068
Susan ComptonSchool of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Caroline ZeissSchool of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Jun HangViral Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6597-7045
Xiu-Feng WanCenter for Influenza and Emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2629-9234
University of Missouri · USAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service · USWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · USYale University · USRice University · US

Funding

Evolution, transmission, and clinical impacts of SARS-CoV-2 variants among urban and rural populationsF30AI172230 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI TANG, CYNTHIA Y · 2022 to 2023
$65k
NIAID NIH HHS F30 AI172230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millions of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) inhabit New York City (NYC), presenting the potential for transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from humans to rats. We evaluated SARS-CoV-2 exposure among 79 rats captured from NYC during the fall of 2021. Our results showed that 13 of the 79 rats (16.5%) tested IgG- or IgM-positive, and partial SARS-CoV-2 genomes were recovered from all 4 rats that were qRT-PCR (reverse transcription-quantitative PCR)-positive. Genomic analyses suggest these viruses were associated with genetic lineage B, which was predominant in NYC in the spring of 2020 during the early pandemic period. To further investigate rat susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 variants, we conducted a virus challenge study and showed that Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants can cause infections in wild-type Sprague Dawley (SD) rats, including high replication levels in the upper and lower respiratory tracts and induction of both innate and adaptive immune responses. Additionally, the Delta variant resulted in the highest infectivity. In summary, our results indicate that rats are susceptible to infection with Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants, and wild Norway rats in the NYC municipal sewer systems have been exposed to SARS-CoV-2. Our findings highlight the need for further monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in urban rat populations and for evaluating the potential risk of secondary zoonotic transmission from these rat populations back to humans.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnimalsHumansNew York CityRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySARS-CoV-2brown ratsDeltaNorway ratsOmicronrat coronavirusrat COVID-19Rattus norvegicusreverse zoonosisSARS-CoV-2surveillancewildlife

Identifiers

PMID36892291
PMCPMC10127689
OpenAlexW4323653768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.