Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36892247›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2023

Potential Anti-Mpox Virus Activity of Atovaquone, Mefloquine, and Molnupiravir, and Their Potential Use as Treatments.

Daisuke Akazawa, Hirofumi Ohashi, Takayuki Hishiki, Takeshi Morita, Shoya Iwanami, Kwang Su Kim, Yong Dam Jeong, Eun-Sil Park, Michiyo Kataoka, Kaho Shionoya and 15 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Therapeutic Innovations for Monkeypox Inhibition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Comprehensive literature review of monkeypox.Emerging microbes & infections · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Daisuke AkazawaResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirofumi OhashiResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayuki HishikiResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi MoritaResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Shoya IwanamiInterdisciplinary Biology Laboratory, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Kwang Su KimInterdisciplinary Biology Laboratory, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Yong Dam JeongInterdisciplinary Biology Laboratory, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Eun-Sil ParkDepartment of Veterinary Science, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Michiyo KataokaDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Kaho ShionoyaDepartment of Virology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Junki MifuneResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Kana TsuchimotoResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinjiro OjimaResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Aa Haeruman AzamResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Shogo NakajimaDepartment of Virology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Hyeongki ParkInterdisciplinary Biology Laboratory, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Tomoki YoshikawaDepartment of Virology I, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayuki ShimojimaDepartment of Virology I, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Kotaro KigaResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Shingo IwamiInterdisciplinary Biology Laboratory, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Ken MaedaDepartment of Veterinary Science, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Tadaki SuzukiDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideki EbiharaDepartment of Virology I, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshimasa TakahashiResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichi WatashiResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
National Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPNagoya University · JPJapan Science and Technology Agency · JPTokyo University of Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMpox virus (MPXV) is a zoonotic orthopoxvirus and caused an outbreak in 2022. Although tecovirimat and brincidofovir are approved as anti-smallpox drugs, their effects in mpox patients have not been well documented. In this study, by a drug repurposing approach, we identified potential drug candidates for treating mpox and predicted their clinical impacts by mathematical modeling.

methodsWe screened 132 approved drugs using an MPXV infection cell system. We quantified antiviral activities of potential drug candidates by measuring intracellular viral DNA and analyzed the modes of action by time-of-addition assay and electron microscopic analysis. We further predicted the efficacy of drugs under clinical concentrations by mathematical simulation and examined combination treatment.

resultsAtovaquone, mefloquine, and molnupiravir exhibited anti-MPXV activity, with 50% inhibitory concentrations of 0.51-5.2 μM, which was more potent than cidofovir. Whereas mefloquine was suggested to inhibit viral entry, atovaquone and molnupiravir targeted postentry processes. Atovaquone was suggested to exert its activity through inhibiting dihydroorotate dehydrogenase. Combining atovaquone with tecovirimat enhanced the anti-MPXV effect of tecovirimat. Quantitative mathematical simulations predicted that atovaquone can promote viral clearance in patients by 7 days at clinically relevant drug concentrations.

conclusionsThese data suggest that atovaquone would be a potential candidate for treating mpox.

Indexed as

MefloquineMonkeypox virusAtovaquoneCytidineHumansHydroxylaminesMpox, MonkeypoxAtovaquoneCytidineHydroxylaminesMefloquinemolnupiravirantiviralatovaquonedihydroorotate dehydrogenasemefloquinemolnupiravirmpoxpan-orthopoxvirus

Identifiers

PMID36892247
PMCPMC10469127
OpenAlexW4323652499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.