Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36892063›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2023

Preferences of Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease for Invasive Versus Conservative Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Todd A Wilson, Glen S Hazlewood, Tolulope T Sajobi, Stephen B Wilton, Winnie E Pearson, Carol Connolly, Pantea A Javaheri, Juli L Finlay, Adeera Levin, Michelle M Graham and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06920927 (Feasibility and Pilot Testing of the "My Heart and CKD" Online Shared Decision Aid), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06920927 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Pilot Testing of the "My Heart and CKD" Online Shared Decision Aid

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2025 to 2027Enrolled220ConditionsChronic Kidney Disease, Coronary Artery DiseaseArmsDecision aid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Todd A WilsonDepartment of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4345-0146
Glen S HazlewoodDepartment of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.
Tolulope T SajobiDepartment of Community Health Sciences University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5696-5552
Stephen B WiltonDepartment of Community Health Sciences University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6344-312X
Winnie E PearsonPatient and Community Engagement Research Program, O'Brien Institute of Public Health University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.
Carol ConnollyPatient and Community Engagement Research Program, O'Brien Institute of Public Health University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.
Pantea A JavaheriDepartment of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7776-5296
Juli L FinlayDepartment of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.
Adeera LevinDivision of Nephrology University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada.
Michelle M GrahamDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0708-7957
Marcello TonelliDepartment of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0846-3187
Matthew T JamesDepartment of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1876-3917
University of Calgary · CAO'Brien Institute · AUUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) can experience acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with high morbidity and mortality. Early invasive management of ACS is recommended for most high-risk patients; however, choosing between an early invasive versus conservative management approach may be influenced by the unique risk of kidney failure for patients with CKD. Methods and Results This discrete choice experiment measured the preferences of patients with CKD for future cardiovascular events versus acute kidney injury and kidney failure following invasive heart procedures for ACS. The discrete choice experiment, consisting of 8 choice tasks, was administered to adult patients attending 2 CKD clinics in Calgary, Alberta. The part-worth utilities of each attribute were determined using multinomial logit models, and preference heterogeneity was explored using latent class analysis. A total of 140 patients completed the discrete choice experiment. The mean age of patients was 64 years, 52% were male, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 37 mL/min per 1.73 m

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAcute Kidney InjuryKidney Failure, ChronicRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAdultConservative TreatmentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Preferenceacute coronary syndromechronic kidney diseasediscrete choice experimentpatient preferencesshared decision‐making

Identifiers

PMID36892063
PMCPMC10111540
OpenAlexW4323652400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.