Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36891940›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

Risk factors for stent dysfunction during long-term follow-up after EUS-guided biliary drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents: A prospective study.

Sophie Geyl, Benjamin Redelsperger, Clara Yzet, Bertrand Napoleon, Romain Legros, Martin Dahan, Hugo Lepetit, Claire Ginestet, Jérémie Jacques, Jérémie Albouys

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie GeylDepartment of Gastroenterology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Benjamin RedelspergerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Clara YzetDepartment of Gastroenterology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Bertrand NapoleonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Private Hospital Jean-Mermoz, Lyon, France.
Romain LegrosDepartment of Gastroenterology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Martin DahanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Hugo LepetitDepartment of Gastroenterology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Claire GinestetDepartment of Gastroenterology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Jérémie JacquesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Jérémie AlbouysDepartment of Gastroenterology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Université de Limoges · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRHôpital Privé Jean Mermo · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: EUS-guided choledoco-duodenostomy using electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents (ECE-LAMS) is becoming the gold standard in case of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography failure for distal malignant obstruction. Long-term data in larger samples are lacking. Methods: This was a prospective monocentric study including all patients who underwent EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) between September 2016 and December 2021. The primary endpoint was the rate of biliary obstruction during follow-up. Secondary endpoints were technical and clinical success rates, adverse event rates, and identification of risk factors for biliary obstruction. Results: One hundred and twenty-three EUS-guided CDS using ECE-LAMS were performed at Limoges University Hospital were performed during the study period and included in the study. The main cause of obstruction was pancreatic adenocarcinoma in 91 (74.5%) cases. The technical and clinical success rates were 97.5% and 91%, respectively. Twenty patients (16.3%) suffered from biliary obstructions during a mean follow-up of 242 days. The clinical success rate for endoscopic desobstruction was 80% (16/20). In uni- and multivariate analyses, only the presence of a duodenal stent (odds ratio [OR]: 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 95%: 1.2-10.2; P = 0.018) and a bile duct thinner than 15 mm (OR: 3.9, CI 95%: 1.3-11.7; P = 0.015) were the significant risk factors for biliary obstruction during the follow-up. Conclusion: Obstruction of LAMS occurred in 16.3% of cases during follow-up and endoscopic desobstruction is efficacious in 80% of cases. The presence of duodenal stent and a bile duct thinner than 15 mm are the risk factors of obstruction. Except in these situation, EUS-CDS with ECE-LAMS could be proposed in the first intent in case of distal malignant obstruction.

Indexed as

EUS-guided biliary drainagelumen-apposing metal stentmalignant distal biliary obstruction

Identifiers

PMID36891940
PMCPMC10237614
OpenAlexW4323341993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.