ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound
Risk factors for stent dysfunction during long-term follow-up after EUS-guided biliary drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents: A prospective study.
Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term palliation of combined malignant gastric outlet and biliary obstruction by using sequentially enteral stents and EUS-guided antegrade biliary and lumen-apposing gastrojejunal stents.Future science OA · 2026Article
- Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Management of Pancreaticobiliary Cancers: Recent Trends and Advances.Cancers · 2026Review
- Changing the Flow: How EUS-Guided Drainage is Reshaping the Management of Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Review
- Optimal endoscopic drainage strategy for concomitant biliary and gastric outlet obstruction: a multicenter retrospective study (ENDO-GOBO).Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Guidewire use in electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent procedures: Results of an online survey from an international working group.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Case Report: Unexpected LAMS obstruction following successful EUS-BD in a patient with pancreatic carcinoma.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- The Classification for Adverse Events in GastRointEstinal Endoscopy (AGREE): Three-Year Evaluation and Additional Recommendations.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- The Gastrointestinal Tract: A Unique Battlefield for Bioengineering Delivery Platforms.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Article
- Biliary drainage in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction: results of an Italian consensus conference.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Managing dysfunctions and reinterventions in endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with lumen apposing metal stents: Illustrated technical review (with videos).Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2024Review
- Will Endoscopic-Ultrasound-Guided Choledocoduodenostomy with Electrocautery-Enhanced Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Placement Replace Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography When Treating Distal Malignant Biliary Obstructions?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- The Role of Lumen Apposing Metal Stents in the Palliation of Distal Malignant Biliary Distal Obstruction.Cancers · 2023Review
- Review
- Clinical outcomes of one-step EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy using an 8F stent introducer featuring an ultra-tapered metal tip and a preloaded partially covered metal stent (with video).Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: EUS-guided choledoco-duodenostomy using electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents (ECE-LAMS) is becoming the gold standard in case of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography failure for distal malignant obstruction. Long-term data in larger samples are lacking. Methods: This was a prospective monocentric study including all patients who underwent EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) between September 2016 and December 2021. The primary endpoint was the rate of biliary obstruction during follow-up. Secondary endpoints were technical and clinical success rates, adverse event rates, and identification of risk factors for biliary obstruction. Results: One hundred and twenty-three EUS-guided CDS using ECE-LAMS were performed at Limoges University Hospital were performed during the study period and included in the study. The main cause of obstruction was pancreatic adenocarcinoma in 91 (74.5%) cases. The technical and clinical success rates were 97.5% and 91%, respectively. Twenty patients (16.3%) suffered from biliary obstructions during a mean follow-up of 242 days. The clinical success rate for endoscopic desobstruction was 80% (16/20). In uni- and multivariate analyses, only the presence of a duodenal stent (odds ratio [OR]: 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 95%: 1.2-10.2; P = 0.018) and a bile duct thinner than 15 mm (OR: 3.9, CI 95%: 1.3-11.7; P = 0.015) were the significant risk factors for biliary obstruction during the follow-up. Conclusion: Obstruction of LAMS occurred in 16.3% of cases during follow-up and endoscopic desobstruction is efficacious in 80% of cases. The presence of duodenal stent and a bile duct thinner than 15 mm are the risk factors of obstruction. Except in these situation, EUS-CDS with ECE-LAMS could be proposed in the first intent in case of distal malignant obstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.