ArticleInternational wound journal2023
Bumping to a rollator walker: How pretibial hematomas create more costs than pretibial lacerations.
Article in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sinuhe Classification for Pretibial Injuries: Categorising Dermatoporotic Wounds.International wound journal · 2026Review
- Article
- Bumping to a rollator walker: How pretibial hematomas create more costs than pretibial lacerations.International wound journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pretibial lacerations (PL) and pretibial hematomas (PH) are debilitating traumas among the elderly and infirm. The injuries are frequently grouped together despite differences in treatment and symptoms. Patients are known to have multiple contacts in health care, perhaps because of inadequate treatment. Despite the burden, financial costs have not been assessed. Calculate and compare the treatment costs of PLs and PHs for differences and provide economic incentives to treat and diagnose patients optimally. From linkage to ICD10 diagnoses, we analysed NordDRG product invoices generated by the treatment of the patients. We calculated and compared the costs of treatment in both cohorts from the invoices. This method has not been previously used for analysing wound care costs. Mean treatment costs were 1800€ (PL) and 3300€ (PH). The total costs, emergency room, surgical treatment, and inpatient care of PHs were higher than PLs (P = .0486, P = .0002, P = .0058, P = .6526). PLs generate more costs from the outpatient clinic but were not statistically significant (P = .6533). PHs cause a higher economic burden than PLs. Costs arise from repeat ER visits and the need for surgeries because of delayed treatment. PLs have multiple contacts in the wound clinic. Improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of both injuries is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.