Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36891572›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie2023

Amphetamine-Related Emergency Department Visits in Ontario, Canada, 2003-2020.

James A G Crispo, Lisa Liu, Paxton Bach, Dominique R Ansell, Branavan Sivapathasundaram, Francis Nguyen, Paul Kurdyak, Dallas P Seitz, Michael Conlon, Jacquelyn J Cragg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

James A G CrispoCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9065-1170
Lisa LiuCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Paxton BachDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Dominique R AnsellEmergency Department, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Branavan SivapathasundaramICES McMaster, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Francis NguyenICES McMaster, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Paul KurdyakICES, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8115-7437
Dallas P SeitzDepartment of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Michael ConlonHealth Sciences North Research Institute, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Jacquelyn J CraggCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 201909MPU
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite unregulated amphetamine use increasing, there are limited data on related emergency department (ED) visits in Canada. Our primary objective was to examine trends in amphetamine-related ED visits over time in Ontario, including by age and sex. Secondary objectives were to examine whether patient characteristics were associated with ED revisit within 6 months.

methodsUsing administrative claims and census data, we calculated annual patient- and encounter-based rates of amphetamine-related ED visits from 2003 to 2020 among individuals 18+ years of age. We also performed a retrospective cohort study of individuals with amphetamine-related ED visits between 2019 and 2020 to determine whether select factors were associated with ED revisit within 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was used to measure associations.

resultsThe population-based rate of amphetamine-related ED visits increased nearly 15-fold between 2003 (1.9/100,000 Ontarians) and 2020 (27.9/100,000 Ontarians). Seventy-five percent of individuals returned to the ED for any reason within 6 months. Psychosis and use of other substances were both independently associated with ED revisit for any reason within 6 months (psychosis: AOR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.30-1.83; other substances: AOR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.57-2.15), whereas having a primary care physician was negatively associated with ED revisit (AOR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.60-0.98).

conclusionsIncreasing rates of amphetamine-related ED visits in Ontario are cause for concern. Diagnoses of psychosis and the use of other substances may serve to identify individuals who are most likely to benefit from both primary and substance-specific care.

Indexed as

AmphetamineEmergency Service, HospitalHumansLogistic ModelsOntarioRetrospective StudiesAmphetamineamphetaminesemergency departmentmarginalizationOntario

Identifiers

PMID36891572
PMCPMC10590093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.