Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36891561›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2023

Development of the Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC): Implementing 21 Components to Catalyze Statewide Improvement in Surgical Care.

Karl Y Bilimoria, Michael F McGee, Mark V Williams, Julie K Johnson, Amy L Halverson, Kevin J O'Leary, Paula Farrell, Juliana Thomas, Remi Love, Lindsey Kreutzer and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sustainable Quality Improvement Through Statewide Collaboratives.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Karl Y BilimoriaIllinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.
Michael F McGeeIllinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.
Mark V WilliamsDepartment of Internal Medicine at Washington University St. Louis.
Julie K JohnsonIllinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.
Amy L HalversonIllinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.
Kevin J O'LearyDivision of Medicine-Hospital Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University.
Paula FarrellIllinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.
Juliana ThomasIllinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.
Remi LoveIllinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.
Lindsey KreutzerIllinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.
Allison R DahlkeIllinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.
Brianna D'OrazioIllinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.
Steven ReinhartDepartment of Process Improvement, Northwestern Medicine.
Katelyn DienesDepartment of Process Improvement, Northwestern Medicine.
Mark SchumacherDepartment of Process Improvement, Northwestern Medicine.
Ying ShanIllinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.
Christopher QuinnIllinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.
Vivek N PrachandDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine.
Susan SullivanDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine.
Kimberly A CradockDepartment of General Surgery, Carle Health.
Kelsi BoydDepartment of General Surgery, Carle Health.
William HopkinsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center.
Colleen FairmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center.
David OdellIllinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.
Jonah J StulbergIllinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.
Cindy BarnardDepartment of Quality Strategies, Northwestern Medicine.
Jane HollIllinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.
Ryan P MerkowIllinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.
Anthony D YangIllinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.

Funding

Evaluating the Implementation of a Multi-Component Quality CollaborativeR01HS024516 · AHRQ · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BILIMORIA, KARL Y · 2016 to 2020
$1.2M
Tailored Adaptation of the AHRQ VTE QI Guide to Local Hospital Context.K08HL145139 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI YANG, ANTHONY D. · 2019 to 2023
$800k
System-Level Implementation to Reduce Excess Opioid Prescribing in SurgeryR34DA044752 · NIDA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI JOHNSON, JULIE KAREN, STULBERG, JONAH JAMES · 2017 to 2019
$711k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024516NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL145139NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA044752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn 2014, 56 Illinois hospitals came together to form a unique learning collaborative, the Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC). Our objectives are to provide an overview of the first three years of ISQIC focused on (1) how the collaborative was formed and funded, (2) the 21 strategies implemented to support quality improvement (QI), (3) collaborative sustainment, and (4) how the collaborative acts as a platform for innovative QI research.

methodsISQIC includes 21 components to facilitate QI that target the hospital, the surgical QI team, and the peri-operative microsystem. The components were developed from available evidence, a detailed needs assessment of the hospitals, reviewing experiences from prior surgical and non-surgical QI Collaboratives, and interviews with QI experts. The components comprise 5 domains: guided implementation (e.g., mentors, coaches, statewide QI projects), education (e.g., process improvement (PI) curriculum), hospital- and surgeon-level comparative performance reports (e.g., process, outcomes, costs), networking (e.g., forums to share QI experiences and best practices), and funding (e.g., for the overall program, pilot grants, and bonus payments for improvement).

resultsThrough implementation of the 21 novel ISQIC components, hospitals were equipped to use their data to successfully implement QI initiatives and improve care. Formal (QI/PI) training, mentoring, and coaching were undertaken by the hospitals as they worked to implement solutions. Hospitals received funding for the program and were able to work together on statewide quality initiatives. Lessons learned at one hospital were shared with all participating hospitals through conferences, webinars, and toolkits to facilitate learning from each other with a common goal of making care better and safer for the surgical patient in Illinois. Over the first three years, surgical outcomes improved in Illinois. DISCUSSION: The first three years of ISQIC improved care for surgical patients across Illinois and allowed hospitals to see the value of participating in a surgical QI learning collaborative without having to make the initial financial investment themselves. Given the strong support and buy-in from the hospitals, ISQIC has continued beyond the initial three years and continues to support QI across Illinois hospitals.

Identifiers

PMID36891561
PMCPMC9987591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.