ArticleCurrent research in food science2023
Analysis of public opinion on food safety in Greater China with big data and machine learning.
Article in Current research in food science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in food safety.NPJ science of food · 2026Review
- A Public Opinion Propagation Model for Human-Made Disasters Considering Herd Behavior and Psychological Involvement.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Application of Bioinformatics and Machine Learning Tools in Food Safety.Current nutrition reports · 2025Review
- A public opinion propagation model for technological disasters.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Local perceptions of foodscapes and their representation in visual and texts: A visual content analysis of photography in Japanese coastal area.Current research in food science · 2025Article
- Perceptions and perspectives towards safe food handling and its practices: a case study at Jahangirnagar University.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2024Article
- Unlocking the potential of social media on food additives for effective science communication.NPJ science of food · 2024Article
- Food Public Opinion Prevention and Control Model Based on Sentiment Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Will Food Safety Incidents Stimulate the Public's Desire for Food Safety Governance?Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Exploring public opinion on health effects of prepared dishes in China through social media comments.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Research on online public opinion dissemination and emergency countermeasures of food safety in universities-take the rat head and duck neck incident in China as an example.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Internet contains a wealth of public opinion on food safety, including views on food adulteration, food-borne diseases, agricultural pollution, irregular food distribution, and food production issues. To systematically collect and analyze public opinion on food safety in Greater China, we developed IFoodCloud, which automatically collects data from more than 3,100 public sources. Meanwhile, we constructed sentiment classification models using multiple lexicon-based and machine learning-based algorithms integrated with IFoodCloud that provide an unprecedented rapid means of understanding the public sentiment toward specific food safety incidents. Our best model's F1 score achieved 0.9737, demonstrating its great predictive ability and robustness. Using IFoodCloud, we analyzed public sentiment on food safety in Greater China and the changing trend of public opinion at the early stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease pandemic, demonstrating the potential of big data and machine learning for promoting risk communication and decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.