ArticleAIMS microbiology2023
Characterization of
Article in AIMS microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatial Differentiation of Heavy Metals/Metalloids, Microbial Risk Genes and Soil Microbiota in a Sulfur-Contaminated Landscape.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Naturally-occurring nematicides of plant origin: two decades of novel chemistries.Pest management science · 2025Review
- Rhizosphere Engineering of Biocontrol Agents Enriches Soil Microbial Diversity and Effectively Controls Root-Knot Nematodes.Microbial ecology · 2024Article
- Biopesticides: a Green Approach Towards Agricultural Pests.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Metagenomic Approach Deciphers the Role of Community Composition of Mycobiome Structured byMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Isolation, Identification and Molecular Mechanism Analysis of the Nematicidal Compound Spectinabilin from Newly IsolatedMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is certainly difficult to estimate productivity losses due to the action of phytopathogenic nematodes but it might be about 12 % of world agricultural production. Although there are numerous tools to reduce the effect of these nematodes, there is growing concern about their environmental impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.